> Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2008 09:45:30 -0300 > From: BeatrizdeFariaLeao <bfleao at terra.com.br> > Subject: Re: Chief Complaint > To: For openEHR clinical discussions <openehr-clinical at openehr.org> > Message-ID: <48E613EA.4050107 at terra.com.br> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > > Sorry I forgot to mention that - it's an observation: > openEHR-EHR-OBSERVATION.triage_main_complaint.v1ao > included in one section: > openEHR-EHR-SECTION.emergency_triage.v1ao > > that is part of our template of emergency assessment. > We have specialized and/or created several attributes to cope with our > needs. > > I plan to write back to the group the modifications we did - just a > matter of finding time to do that. Most of what we've done it's to > change in the template either the combo content or to make a bind with a > local terminology. > > Again that is the part we do not like in the model - since it's just an > URL - this is not enough to guarantee the semantic interoperability! > Where are you using it? > We have it deployed in a HIS running in Angola. > > Cheers, > Beatriz >
Right, I am writing an open source HIS which hopefully will start hospital deployments in the spring. I am loading the official archetypes to provide the core content and then anything I cannot map I will assign a LOINC or SNOMED code and then map it to an archetype later. thanks for the info ! Greg
