Hi Everyone,

My apologies if you receive this message twice -- I got a "message too 
large" error from the list-serv, so I am re-posting without attachments.

I'm new to the OpenEHR list, but thought I'd comment on this discussion 
with hopefully some relevant insights.

I am a co-chair of the HL7 Clinical Decision Support (CDS) Work Group, and 
we have been working on several relevant standards around CDS services. Of 
note, these standards are based on our operational use of this approach, 
including for a point-of-care chronic disease management system used by 
approximately 500 clinicians at Duke University Health System; a 
population health management system that supports care managers, 
clinicians, and patients within North Carolina Medicaid; and systems that 
remotely access our CDS service from Argentina and from Massachusetts.

Below are several standards and resources that may be relevant to this 
discussion thread:

> The HL7 Decision Support Service draft standard, which provides a common 
functional specification for how CDS services should work:
http://www.hl7.org/v3ballot2009jan/html/infrastructure/dss/dss.htm

> The OMG Decision Support Service draft standard (soon to be a full 
normative standard), which was adopted in December 2009 and provides an 
implementable Web service specification based on the HL7 standard: 
http://hssp-dss.wikispaces.com/omg_specification

Of note, both the HL7 and OMG Decision Support Service standards support 
the use of semantic payloads defined outside of HL7, such as OpenEHR 
Archetypes.

> As the above standards specify interaction models but not the semantic 
payloads, we are also working on a specification for service input and 
output data known as the HL7 virtual medical record (vMR) standard.  This 
standard will be compatible with using HL7 v3 information models as the 
input, but we also intend to allow the use of other sources of data (e.g., 
CCR, HL7 V2 messages, and hopefully OpenEHR Archetypes).  This work is 
based on an an analysis of CDS data needs across 20 institutions from 4 
countries, and it underwent initial balloting last month.  More 
information on this work can be found at the following wiki: 
http://wiki.hl7.org/index.php?title=Virtual_Medical_Record_(vMR).  Of 
note, myself and other members of this project team have been following 
some of the comments regarding this project posted on the OpenEHR lists, 
and have found them to be quite helpful and aligned with some of the 
issues we are grappling with.  We are trying to learn more about OpenEHR 
to see how we can leverage it for this emerging HL7 standard, and we hope 
to learn more from the expertise available in the OpenEHR community.

> A presentation I recently gave that provides an overview of these 
standards and describes a recently initiatied effort to develop an 
open-source, IP-free reference implementation compliant with the HL7/OMG 
Decision Support Service standard.  This system will be an evolution from 
the currently operational CDS service I developed known as SEBASTIAN, with 
the key differentiators being: (1) full standards compliance, (2) use of 
an open-source rules authoring, management, and execution environment 
(Drools), and (3) adoption of an open-source, IP-free model to facilitate 
collaboration and adoption.  I am spear-heading this multi-institutional 
effort.
http://community.jboss.org/servlet/JiveServlet/download/14964-115-12135/Kawamoto%20K%20--%20CDS%20with%20HL7%20and%20Drools,%20v03.ppt

> A recent JAMIA article describing the broader HL7-OMG effort to develop 
standard service interface specifications for healthcare:
http://jamia.bmj.com/content/16/6/874.abstract

> A paper on how this kind of a standards-based, service-oriented approach 
to CDS could be leveraged to enable personalized medicine in a highly 
scalable manner.  I have a strong interest in this area and am currently 
supported by the National Human Genome Research Institute to explore how 
to enable scalable CDS for genomic and personalized medicine.
http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6947/9/17

> We also have two potentially relevant papers pending e-publication, one 
analyzing the landscape of standards related to CDS (including for CDS 
services) and another providing an experience-based analysis of the pros 
and cons of using a services-based approach to CDS.  Once these 
manuscripts are publicly available, I will plan to post them to the list 
for reference.

Thanks!
Ken Kawamoto

HL7 CDS Work Group Co-Chair
Project Lead, HL7/OMG Decision Support Services project and HL7 Virtual 
Medical Record project

=======================================
Kensaku Kawamoto, M.D., Ph.D.
Assistant Professor
Division of Clinical Informatics
Department of Community and Family Medicine
Member, Institute for Genome Sciences & Policy
Member, Center for Health Informatics
Duke University
Tel: (919)684-2340
Fax: (919)684-8675




"Shannon Tony (Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust)" <tony.shannon at nhs.net> 

Sent by: openehr-clinical-bounces at openehr.org
07/05/2010 03:12 AM
Please respond to
For openEHR clinical discussions <openehr-clinical at openehr.org>


To
"timothywayne.cook at gmail.com" <timothywayne.cook at gmail.com>, For openEHR 
clinical discussions <openehr-clinical at openehr.org>
cc

Subject
RE: Decision Support Providers






Thanks Tim

Sounds like that work was ahead of its time. I hadn't come across it 
before.
Any key conclusions you drew from that work?

Regards,

Tony

________________________________________
From: [email protected] 
[openehr-clinical-bounces at openehr.org] On Behalf Of Tim Cook 
[timothywayne.cook at gmail.com]
Sent: 29 June 2010 16:32
To: For openEHR clinical discussions
Subject: Re: Decision Support Providers

On Tue, 2010-06-29 at 13:57 +0100, Tony Shannon wrote:
> Many thanks Rong,
>
> The approach you outline which reuses archetypes and templates from EHR
> models resonates as a logical way to tackle this.

Though it was redesigned to use CDA in order to hopefully gain
acceptance with vendors EGADSS was originally designed (by me) for use
with archetypes and templates.  The implemented concepts and possibly
the source code could be reused.

http://egadss.sourceforge.net/

HTH,
Tim


>
> John Halamka mentions in his blog...
> "Thus, Anvita has defined clinical decision support (CDS) standards to
> transmit decision support recommendations from the service provider back
> to the EHR. I am unaware any widely implemented standards that do this
> today. "
>
> Can you comment on his quote/article?
>
> Also can you say some more about the rules element of your work..
>
> Many thanks,
>
> Tony
>
> Dr. Tony Shannon
> Consultant in Emergency Medicine, Leeds Teaching Hospitals
> Clinical Lead for Informatics,    Leeds Teaching Hospitals
> Chair, Clinical Review Board, openEHR Foundation
> +44.789.988 5068            tony.shannon at nhs.net
>
>
> Rong Chen wrote:
> > Hi Tony,
> >
> > I take the challenge to comment ;-)
> >
> > We start to see this kind of CDS services emerging now in Sweden.
> > Web-services based drug interaction check is a good example of this.
> > The difference is that the content (drug database) is available to the
> > users. So it's not really a black-box. I doubt that a black-box CDS
> > implementation will be very popular among the clinicians.
> >
> > I also think remote-service based CDS for raising single
> > alerts/reminders can be useful in some limited scope but  will not
> > scale up to provide more comprehensive CDS functions. I am more in
> > favour of developing CDS content based on standardised EHR models so
> > CDS applications can be implemented directly within EHRs.
> >
> > We start to exploring representing clinical guidelines using openEHR
> > archetypes/templates and rules. Using EHR models to represent
> > guidelines could give several potential benefits: 1) reuse of existing
> > EHR content models as building blocks of guidelines; 2) increase
> > interoperability between CDS applications and EHRs; 3) facilitate
> > guideline compliance checking.
> >
> > More details can be found in our MIE2009 paper:
> > 
http://www.imt.liu.se/~ronch/MIE2009_Representing_Lymphoma_Guideline_5page_v3.pdf

> >
> > Cheers,
> > Rong
> >
> > On 25 June 2010 17:24, Shannon Tony (Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS
> > Trust) <tony.shannon at nhs.net> wrote:
> >> FYI..
> >>
> >> A thought provoking post from John Halamka on decision support 
providers as service.
> >> 
http://geekdoctor.blogspot.com/2010/06/decision-support-service-providers.html

> >> Some of you might have complementary/alternative views as to how this 
might work within an openEHR enabled landscape...
> >>
> >> Rong
> >> Would you like to comment?
> >> Your recent work covered some of this key territory..
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >>
> >> Tony
> > _______________________________________________
> > openEHR-clinical mailing list
> > openEHR-clinical at openehr.org
> > http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical
> >
>
> --
>
>
> 
********************************************************************************************************************
>
> This message may contain confidential information. If you are not the 
intended recipient please inform the
> sender that you have received the message in error before deleting it.
> Please do not disclose, copy or distribute information in this e-mail or 
take any action in reliance on its contents:
> to do so is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.
>
> Thank you for your co-operation.
>
> NHSmail is the secure email and directory service available for all NHS 
staff in England and Scotland
> NHSmail is approved for exchanging patient data and other sensitive 
information with NHSmail and GSI recipients
> NHSmail provides an email address for your career in the NHS and can be 
accessed anywhere
> For more information and to find out how you can switch, visit 
www.connectingforhealth.nhs.uk/nhsmail
>
> 
********************************************************************************************************************
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> openEHR-clinical mailing list
> openEHR-clinical at openehr.org
> http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical

--
***************************************************************
Timothy Cook, MSc

LinkedIn Profile:http://www.linkedin.com/in/timothywaynecook
Skype ID == (upon request)
Academic.Edu Profile: http://uff.academia.edu/TimothyCook

You may get my Public GPG key from  popular keyservers or
from this link http://timothywayne.cook.googlepages.com/home


********************************************************************************************************************

This message may contain confidential information. If you are not the 
intended recipient please inform the
sender that you have received the message in error before deleting it.
Please do not disclose, copy or distribute information in this e-mail or 
take any action in reliance on its contents:
to do so is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.

Thank you for your co-operation.

NHSmail is the secure email and directory service available for all NHS 
staff in England and Scotland
NHSmail is approved for exchanging patient data and other sensitive 
information with NHSmail and GSI recipients
NHSmail provides an email address for your career in the NHS and can be 
accessed anywhere
For more information and to find out how you can switch, visit 
www.connectingforhealth.nhs.uk/nhsmail

********************************************************************************************************************


_______________________________________________
openEHR-clinical mailing list
openEHR-clinical at openehr.org
http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20100709/5b14e84f/attachment.html>

Reply via email to