IMO we are over-engineering things that can be solved by agreeing on a set of rules. We even have two lists technical and implements and there might be just one.
The active members of the community that participate in these channels is low. Adding more communication channels will just disperse the community. We need less channels and usage rules. On Dec 30, 2016 6:18 AM, "Thomas Beale" <thomas.be...@openehr.org> wrote: > > Following from what you and Bert have said, it seems that the following > could make sense: > > - Foundation announcements list / channel (= openehr-announce list we > have now) > - software / libraries / tools announcements (= web home page news > items with cog icon, also here > <http://www.openehr.org/news_events/releases>) > - this includes open source software libs / projects > - commercial product offerings - currently we don't really have a > way of doing this, but Industry Partners can post on web home page (factory > icon) > > I'm not sure what the right approach is, since there are many technical > possibilities. > > Marcus Baw has proposed moving to Discourse <http://www.discourse.org/> > as a forum platform - maybe this is the kind of thing we should look at? > > - thomas > > On 29/12/2016 17:16, Diego Boscá wrote: > > Well, we will provide for free a product that was behind a paywall > before (LinkEHR lite was the free version we had, and now the 'basic' > and free version is the equivalent to the past LinkEHR editor). I'm > curious what kind of announcement we could make :) > > > > > _______________________________________________ > openEHR-technical mailing list > openehr-techni...@lists.openehr.org > http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr- > technical_lists.openehr.org >
_______________________________________________ openEHR-clinical mailing list openEHR-clinical@lists.openehr.org http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org
