I would say one needs both:
Evaluation: when calculating by the author the BMI-number using existing 
weight/height data
Observation: when reading/copying by the author aa a BMI-result from a source

Gerard Freriks
+31 620347088
gf...@luna.nl

> On 10 Apr 2017, at 08:33, Bert Verhees <bert.verh...@rosa.nl> wrote:
> 
> Hi, 
> 
> Shouldn't the BMI archetype on CKM be of type Evaluation? One does not 
> observe BMI, it is a calculation.
> openEHR-EHR-OBSERVATION.body_mass_index.v1
> Thanks for your comments.
> 
> Bert
> _______________________________________________
> openEHR-clinical mailing list
> openEHR-clinical@lists.openehr.org
> http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org

_______________________________________________
openEHR-clinical mailing list
openEHR-clinical@lists.openehr.org
http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org

Reply via email to