Hi, As far as I remember this separation was the result of agreements between LOINC and SNOMED.
When I was looking for codes that could be attached to nodes in the archetype I was referred to LOINC. SNOMED made it clear that they were not the party that could help me. In a way it can make sense. SNOMED has a real ontology behind it. And is using the Open World assumption. LOINC is NOT an terminology but as I see it a Classification with rules and a syntax. LOINC and Archetypes are really Closed World artefacts. Gerard Freriks +31 620347088 gf...@luna.nl Kattensingel 20 2801 CA Gouda the Netherlands > On 12 Mar 2018, at 09:12, Birger Haarbrandt <birger.haarbra...@plri.de> wrote: > > Hi Gerard, > > are you able to provide more information on the reasoning that led to this > decision? Maybe links to documents or any other insights? This would be quite > interesting for our acitivities in Germany. > > Best,
_______________________________________________ openEHR-clinical mailing list openEHRfirstname.lastname@example.org http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org