Dear Evelyn, The ideas I have are collected in a rough document called SIAMM (Semantic Interpretability Artefact Modelling Method) This is known by several persons active in ISO/CEN.
At present I’m no longer actively involved in standardisation work. Gerard Freriks +31 620347088 gf...@luna.nl Kattensingel 20 2801 CA Gouda the Netherlands > On 29 Jun 2018, at 01:25, Dr Evelyn Hovenga <ehove...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Gerard I suggest you prepare a concept proposal for your standards > organisation to submit to CEN or ISO. My co-director of GeHCo chairs the ISO > WG on all data matters, have you had a look at their current worklist? ICO > TC2215 or CEN TC251? Anyone who identifies a standards gap is able to take > action through the relevant organisations. > > Evelyn > > From: openEHR-clinical <openehr-clinical-boun...@lists.openehr.org> On Behalf > Of GF > Sent: Friday, 29 June 2018 9:12 AM > To: Bert Verhees <bert.verh...@rosa.nl> > Cc: For openEHR clinical discussions <openehr-clinical@lists.openehr.org> > Subject: Re: Machine Learning , some thoughts > > Bert, > > Any one automobile or airplane or house is built using many, many standards. > > The models/standards I mentioned deal with a particular aspect of data to be > stored, retrieved, processed and exchanged. > Data that is generated in and by a patient in a context, > observed by a person in a context > Data that is documented using a structural model, > using codings systems based on models/standards, > etc. etc. > > All are important, none is king or the centre of the world. > > Gerard > > Your joke deals with the situation where there are competing standards. > In my case I mention standards that do not compete, do not overlap. > > > > > Gerard Freriks > +31 620347088 > gf...@luna.nl <mailto:gf...@luna.nl> > > Kattensingel 20 > 2801 CA Gouda > the Netherlands > > >> On 29 Jun 2018, at 00:15, Bert Verhees <bert.verh...@rosa.nl >> <mailto:bert.verh...@rosa.nl>> wrote: >> >> GF said: We need standards on how to describe the health data and their >> epistemology/context, modeling patterns and rules on how to use coding >> systems and deal with ‘negation’, just to mention a few other things needed >> to define data inside EHR systems in such a way that data can exchanged. >> >> Dear Gerard, you know the joke? >> >> A: We have 14 standards how to be interoperable in healthcare IT >> B: What? I go and create a new standard which replaces all these standards. >> A: We have 15 standards how to be interoperable in healthcare IT >> >> The lesson is: We are all to small to be the center of the universe. We can >> all be a part of it, nothing more. >> > > > _______________________________________________ > openEHR-clinical mailing list > openEHR-clinical@lists.openehr.org > http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
_______________________________________________ openEHR-clinical mailing list openEHR-clinical@lists.openehr.org http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org
