Dear Ian, We are in discussions with a state government in India for the use of our EHR.Network platform for implementing a public Mental Health Management System(MHMS) in line with the Indian National mental healthcare act 2017(MHA).
Some of the requirements of this system are registration of advance directives, consent and designated persons. As the MHA defines mental healthcare as a right, these directives hold a very critical role in care related decisions. While exploring options and trying to understand how others have gone ahead with such requirements, we came across some archetypes that (I think) you had posted in the following link http://ckm.apperta.org/ckm/ retrieveResources?list=true. Can you give some background on how these were used and if you believe that they are still relevant? Is there any plans to port these to the OpenEHR CKM for more wider use? My specific questions are 1. Were these meant to be used as the source of ultimate truth or just for information at point of care? 2. In our case there is a formal registration process with submission and approval by people in authority. Was this envisaged when creating the above archetypes? 3. Are you aware of any previous OpenEHR implementations for Mental health care? Thanks in advance regards Dileep V S *Founder* HealtheLife Ventures LLP m: +91 9632888113 a: 106, Innovation Centre, IIIT, Electronics City, Bangalore 560100 w: healthelife.in e: dil...@healthelife.in
_______________________________________________ openEHR-clinical mailing list openEHR-clinical@lists.openehr.org http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org
