Here was an earlier effort by me based on the Contsys approach.

https://github.com/openehr-clinical/shn-contsys

Ian

Dr Ian McNicoll
mobile +44 (0)775 209 7859
office +44 (0)1536 414994
skype: ianmcnicoll
email: [email protected]
twitter: @ianmcnicoll



Director, freshEHR Clinical Informatics Ltd.
CCIO inidus Ltd. [email protected]
Co-Chair, openEHR Foundation [email protected]
Hon. Senior Research Associate, CHIME, UCL


On Wed, 26 Jun 2019 at 15:07, Thomas Beale <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Paul,
>
> things like Problem lists are 'interesting', and I consider them a second
> order informational artefact. The short answer on how to do them is
> probably something like this:
>
>    - creating an artefact to represent a specific problem such as chest
>    pain will mostly be done at execution time, by working clinicians deciding
>    what things are 'related to' the given problem;
>       - such choices are likely to be somewhat subjective, i.e. no
>       guarantee that two clinicians would make the same choices;
>       - technically a problem in the POMR sense could be represented as a
>    dedicated Composition containing LINKs or DV_EHR_URI references to the bits
>    and pieces of interest elsewhere in the EHR;
>    - tag(s) could be added a priori to EHR content (e.g. lab results,
>    physical exams, ECGs, etc) before it is committed, identifying it as part
>    of some particular problem(s), or similarly, Compositions could be
>    classified under Folders representing problems, just as they already are
>    under Folders representing episodes - but of course this relies on health
>    workers knowing what problems are 'defined' in the EHR, and whether the new
>    content should be added.
>       - Realistically, most linking of content to a problem is likely to
>       be a post hoc process.
>
> As yet, the machinery to do this mostly exists, but there is little in the
> way of standardised patterns or usage of it to achieve any kind of
> standardised 'problem' document (NB: not the same as 'problem list' - which
> is one level up, and is a managed list of issues considered to be problems,
> usually inclding current Dxs such as diabetes etc).
>
> To go further, e.g. to automate any of this would be a question of
> creating rule-sets in which each rule detects a certain kind of content
> being committed (using an AQL query or AQL path matcher or ADL match
> expression), and adds a link to that content from the dedicated
> Composition. Such rules would be evaluated on data commits to the EHR
> inside a rule engine.
>
> I suspect the best we can do at the moment is to standardise use of the
> above mechanisms to create problem descriptions in a generic sense.
> Experimentation with rules over time should eventually generate some
> reliable patterns.
>
> - thomas
> On 26/06/2019 10:41, Bakke, Silje Ljosland via openEHR-clinical wrote:
>
> Hi Paul!
>
>
>
> Yes, this is part of the openEHR specification LINK class (
> https://specifications.openehr.org/releases/RM/latest/docs/common.html#_link_class
> ), and it needs to be handled by the application. I know DIPS has started
> using this in some functional areas like their hospital care plan module,
> but I don’t remember the details. Maybe someone from DIPS can elaborate.
>
>
>
> Mvh.
>
> *Silje*
>
>
>
> *From:* openEHR-clinical <[email protected]>
> <[email protected]> *On Behalf Of *Paul Miller
> *Sent:* Wednesday, June 26, 2019 3:36 PM
> *To:* For openEHR clinical discussions
> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
> *Subject:* Problem orientation in OpenEHR
>
>
>
> How would we do this?
>
>
>
> There is a method of implementation in problem oriented records whereby a
> header, generally the ‘problem’, is linked to other record entries or
> elements that are to do with that problem.
>
>
>
> So ‘chest pain’ as a problem may be linked to blood tests, clinical notes,
> ECG, CXR and medications that were ordered or reported as part of the work
> up of that condition.
>
>
>
> In interfaces this allows for views of the record showing the Problem and
> all linked events/entries/data. It’s essentially what Larry Weed used to
> talk about.
>
>
>
> Of course things may relate to more than one Problem, Problems may link to
> each other, Problem headers and content will change over time. There is
> usually a fair amount of manual curation, which may be very contextual, but
> theoretical a lot of it could be automated.
>
>
>
> By modelling this linkage in data it would become computable, and
> potentially make some clinicians very happy in their work!
>
>
>
> Is this something that is part of openEHR specification or that can be
> modelled in archetypes? Or is it down to the application to manage this?
>
>
>
> Thanks for any help.  As always slightly anxious that am missing something
> completely obvious, so apologies if so!!
>
>
>
> Paul
>
> Dr Paul Miller
>
> GP, Glenburn Medical Practice
>
> Clinical Lead, NES Digital Service
>
> Mobile/WhatsApp: +44 7711 346 938
>
>
> --
>
> --
>
> Dr Paul Miller
>
> MBCHB MRCGP FFCI DRCOG DMI
> Glenburn Medical Practice
> Fairway Avenue
> Paisley
> PA2 8DX
> Tel: 0141 884 7788
>
> http://www.glenburnsurgery.scot.nhs.uk/
>
>
>
> Clinical Lead
>
> NES Digital Service
>
> https://nds.nes.digital/
>
>
>
> Mobile: +44 7711 346 928
>
> Twitter: @docpaulmiller
>
> _______________________________________________
> openEHR-clinical mailing 
> [email protected]http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org
>
> --
> Thomas Beale
> Principal, Ars Semantica <http://www.arssemantica.com>
> Consultant, ABD Project, Intermountain Healthcare
> <https://intermountainhealthcare.org/>
> Management Board, Specifications Program Lead, openEHR Foundation
> <http://www.openehr.org>
> Health IT blog <http://wolandscat.net/> | Culture blog
> <http://wolandsothercat.net/> | The Objective Stance
> <https://theobjectivestance.net/>
> _______________________________________________
> openEHR-clinical mailing list
> [email protected]
>
> http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org
>
_______________________________________________
openEHR-clinical mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org

Reply via email to