As an observer it seems to me there has been a lot of effort to codify
encounters and make the data in them computable and recallable.Then we
create an entity called problem which has little formal connection
with this data - it is the synthesis by a sophisticated clinician of a
shorthand summary describing that patient in a useful way. This to me
is the essence of what I do apart from management decisions of course.
Without this the record is just a set of (relatively) raw data. I dont
think computers are at the stage where they can replace the clinician
in doing this - though it might an interesting AI problem.The
synthesis of a relevant problem list is especially important in
multimorbid patients which now form a large proportion of our work.To
me SOAP is a structured way to think about an encounter and is not
particularly relevant to a problem list - unless you see the "A" part
as the Assessment for the whole patient.R          

----- Original Message -----
From: "For openEHR clinical discussions" 
To:
Cc:
Sent:Wed, 3 Jul 2019 17:35:07 +0100
Subject:Re: Problem orientation in OpenEHR

 On 28/06/2019 06:48, Paul Miller wrote:
 >
 > I maybe don't quite understand yet the approach Thomas suggests for

 > SOAP persistence. In my head SOAP is a way of structuring an
encounter 
 > (not modelling a 'problem'), and various other such encounter
headings 
 > are present in other EHRs. Thus I think any encounter recorded in a

 > SOAP structure may relate to a 'problem', but not actually be the 
 > definition of the problem itself. Although if an initial encounter 
 > record using SOAP or whatever was persisted and curated I can see
how 
 > that may build a meaningful set of links, although still not sure
we 
 > have the 'Problem' defined there?

 well my epistemological (and non-MD) view is that thinking of a SOAP 
 structure not just as the headings for a 'SOAP note', but as the 
 headings for a 'problem summary' or similar, could create better
quality 
 problem-oriented data in the record. If there was a small catalogue
of 
 'problems' (anything for which a SOAP structure summary already
created 
 in the past), each with a title that could be anything from a patient

 issue (chronic back pain) to a solid Dx (diabetes), then the UI could

 show that list, and when a new encounter occurred, the doc could
create 
 (structured) event notes as usual, and also (by some efficient 
 drag-n-drop) choose an existing problem and attach some of those
notes 
 (e.g. patient stmt, phys exam, etc) to it, rather than just creating
a 
 new SOAP note. Or it might be the other way around, where one or more

 problems is chosen from the list, and the notes created inside them 
 visually, which would still create independent event notes, and links

 from the relevant problems (i.e. the link could be removed or ignored
in 
 the future).

 If that kind of approach were used in a fairly disciplined way, it
might 
 lead to the emergence of some high-quality problem oriented content
in 
 the EHR, in theory making it progressively easier for docs seeing the

 patient later in time to get an efficient feel for what is going on
with 
 that patient.

 I don't know if any systems actually work like that, and it might not

 even work even theoretically in some cases, since it's easy enough to

 imagine that under the problem 'chest pain', on one day, the patient 
 describes a minor feeling of heaviness, but a month later, true 
 radiating pain angina symptoms. For that to work in one SOAP
structure, 
 you start having to have headings like 'progression', and somehow
order 
 the patient impressions from different points in time. On the other 
 hand, if you chose 'angina' as your problem, non-angina chest pain
would 
 have to go somewhere else...

 All of this may well be too esoteric to be worthwhile. The more basic

 value of SOAP is still available for recording an encounter: it
nicely 
 separates the patient subjective impression from the HCP's
observations, 
 and separates both of those from assessment (which is not an 
 observation, despite what some docs say!)

 - thomas

 _______________________________________________
 openEHR-clinical mailing list
 [email protected]
 http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org

_______________________________________________
openEHR-clinical mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org

Reply via email to