Yes. Just rename to whatever works for you. We would never search on the section only on the entry archetypes underneath so the way that you group or name that group does not affect the querying of the data.
Ian On Fri, 19 Jul 2019, 10:32 J Grant Forrest, <[email protected]> wrote: > I didn't know about section archetypes, but now that you mention it, I see > that's what I've actually used - > openEHR-EHR-SECTION.investigations_results_rcp.v1 > > I was thinking about grouping in the model - essentially what I've done is > to rename the section archetype "Biometrics, Vital Signs and Investigation > Results". > > From what you say, it sounds as though that's an acceptable way to > organise/categorise the archetypes within that section. > > On point 2, I'll try the problem diagnosis archetypes approach initially > and see how I get on. > > Cheers > > Grant > On 18/07/2019 17:18, Ian McNicoll wrote: > > Hi Grant > > 1. I'm not sure if you are asking about the groupings in the ui or in the > models. Non invasive blood pressure could appear wherever it makes most > sense for you. You can also use section archetypes to group items in the > composition but I would never want to imply meaning by the parent grouping. > A blood pressure is a blood pressure whether you consider this locally to > be best grouped under examination or investigation. Headings are useful but > in openehr the querying is designed to be able to ignore the section > archetypes. > > 2. Is a tricky question as it partly depends on who is asking the > question, why and what ought to happen if someone picks up a new diagnosis. > Should this be added formally as a diagnosis to the patients record. > > The pure but more complex approach is to handle this with a set of problem > diagnosis archetypes to capture positive responses and exclusion archetypes > to handle the negatives. This has the benefit of the data being collected > in more reusable and codsble way but is more annoying to hook up to the ui. > > The quick and dirty alternative is to create a local archetype with a set > of booleans that just ask angina yes no. Easy to fit the ui but essentially > throw away. > > Ian. > > > > > > On Thu, 18 Jul 2019, 09:34 J Grant Forrest, <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Hello All, been doing a bit of work (with help from Ian McNicoll) on an >> OpenEHR template for surgical pre-operative assessment. >> >> You can view the results of my efforts (and Ian's) here : >> >> https://github.com/johngrant4est/surgical_preassessment >> >> and I'm not sure how this works in terms of sharing but the working repo >> is here : >> >> >> https://ehrscape.marand.si/designerv2/#/designer/repos/surgical_preassessment >> >> The template is being built in the form of a Report, which sort of >> matches the real world, in as much as someone does the assessment which is >> then made available as a report. >> >> I have 2 challenges currently : >> >> 1. How to group the concepts of Biometrics, Physiological variables e.g. >> Vital Signs and Investigation Results e.g. labs, radiology. These all feel >> as though they should be grouped somehow as part of the assessment but >> there is a conflict (in my head) between the archetypes for >> investigations_results and exam findings. Is NIBP an investigation or an >> exam finding ? I appreciate that the line between these concepts is a bit >> blurred. >> >> 2. How to model the typical systematic enquiry when taking a history >> relevant for peri-op care, e.g. how to record the presence of angina, >> hypertension, heart failure, murmurs and group them under "Cardiovascular". >> >> Any thoughts ? >> >> Cheers >> >> Grant >> -- >> >> Dr J Grant Forrest >> Webmaster, SCATA >> www.scata.org.uk >> _______________________________________________ >> openEHR-clinical mailing list >> [email protected] >> >> http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org >> > > _______________________________________________ > openEHR-clinical mailing > [email protected]http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org > > -- > > Dr J Grant Forrest > Webmaster, SCATA > www.scata.org.uk > _______________________________________________ > openEHR-clinical mailing list > [email protected] > > http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org >
_______________________________________________ openEHR-clinical mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org
