Hi Pablo,
I highly appreciate your initiative, I think it is very good and
important. I have just a few, but for me, important remarks.
It is not to be picky, but, for me, it is hard for me to use the form.
It should be company orientated or product orientated, but not both at
the same time, or else the questions/answers can be ambiguous.
Best is product related, and with some add-on questions for other
products and/or the company.
For example:
Areas you / your company are working on <-- Should this incorporate all
activities of the company? Wouldn't it be better to ask for the product
what it is?
Code is open or planned to be open? <-- Is this about the product, or
about the company, and what if it is mixed, and even in one product code
can be partly open/closed
Current status, Solutions already built, being developed, planned or
ideas for the future. <-- This seems to be a company wide question.
Maybe I will use the form, but then with an unsatisfying feeling of
leaving an ambiguous message to the public.
I have some suggestions to improve the form:
Focus on the product being created, make questions more open, so
situations which did not come to mind when creating the form.
- So, for the code, give more answer-possibilities, or add an option for
more information where it can be explained.
Most products I know are partly build from open source components, and
sometimes, products offer parts of its code to the public.
- For the areas working on, focus this to the product, what kind of
product is it.
Then, optionally, give room for more information, example, what does the
company/organization do, what are its goals, etc.
Almost finally, the presentation:
I don't think this way of presenting the information in a table is a
good way. The table becomes too wide and the columns are too small and
are hard to read, especially when there will be more initiatives listed.
And then finally:
I think it is good if writers of information can edit their information.
They can change policy or detect an error. It can feel depending if help
from others is needed to change, add or remove information. I understand
that there needs to be some moderation, but that can well be done
afterwards.
How to solve this?
I was thinking of a wiki-layout where the form needs to be used, on the
left side can be a column/index of all the pages, ranked on product,
kind of product developer or company. In this way, it can be easy to
find products of a specific need, and what a developer company does. In
this way, it will be a free market idea, I think that is good.
I think when (some of) these changes have been added to your initiative,
it will be used more. I know already someone who wants to use this
initiative after the changes.
Best regards, and thank you for the good work. I hope you will consider
the few remarks I made
Bert
On 29-05-17 03:59, Pablo Pazos wrote:
Hi all,
I just published the received responses. So far only four members of
the community shared they work, ideas and needs. For you:
Hope this can get others motivated to follow. We need to improve our
community, collaborate and be more open.
https://openehr.atlassian.net/wiki/display/dev/Development+Community+Coordination
On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 4:56 AM, Seung Jong Yu <ggoj...@gmail.com
<mailto:ggoj...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Good Idea, Pablo !
Even if I can not support openEHR specific terminology services, I
filled form :)
Seung-Jong Yu MD
seungjong...@gmail.com <mailto:seungjong...@gmail.com>
Certified Board of Family Medicine
CEO, InfoClinic Co., Ltd. (i...@infoclinic.co
<mailto:i...@infoclinic.co>
,
http://infoclinic.co <http://infoclinic.co/>
)
Administrator, openEHR Korea (
mas...@openehr.kr <mailto:mas...@openehr.kr> ,
http://www.openehr.kr <http://www.openehr.kr/>)
HL7 Korea Board of Director (http://hl7korea.or.kr)
Mobile : 82-10-4752-5435
ggoj...@gmail.com <mailto:ggoj...@gmail.com> ( only for mailing list )
2017-05-20 1:29 GMT+09:00 Pablo Pazos <pablo.pa...@cabolabs.com
<mailto:pablo.pa...@cabolabs.com>>:
Hi all,
We were discussing on other threads about the need to improve
the tools, ref impls and frameworks we use for openEHR stuff.
We are few in the community working on those areas, and
sometimes doing duplicated work and overlapping solutions.
I believe if we know who is working on what, we can make a
better use of our collective time as a community, and reuse
others work, or even help on their projects.
Modeling tools are getting behind the specs progress, tool
chain is broken and needs manual work to get modeling done,
open implementation tech stacks are not complete, etc...
What if we can publish the areas we are working on, tools that
we already have, and try to coordinate better to fix those
issues and collaborate better as a community?
I have created a small google form to gather and share that
info, it has these questions:
1. On which areas are you / your company working on? (modeling
tools, CDRs, APIs, ...)
2. Is code open or planned to be open?
3. Current status (idea, planned, developing, developed,
released, ...)
4. Main issues and challenges (for the community to help)
5. Available tools / solutions and where to find them
If you see there is another question that can add value to
this, please let me know. After this is complete, I'll share
the form. When we have some answers, I'll publish them on the
wiki.
Hopefully others can this this as an opportunity to move
forward on the modeling and dev areas to increase openEHR
adoption.
Kind regards,
Pablo.
--
Ing. Pablo Pazos Gutiérrez
Cel:(00598) 99 043 145 <tel:099%20043%20145>
Skype: cabolabs
<http://cabolabs.com/>
http://www.cabolabs.com <http://www.cabolabs.com/>
pablo.pa...@cabolabs.com <mailto:pablo.pa...@cabolabs.com>
Subscribe to our newsletter <http://eepurl.com/b_w_tj>
_______________________________________________
openEHR-technical mailing list
openehr-techni...@lists.openehr.org
<mailto:openehr-techni...@lists.openehr.org>
http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
<http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org>
_______________________________________________
openEHR-implementers mailing list
openEHR-implementers@lists.openehr.org
<mailto:openEHR-implementers@lists.openehr.org>
http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-implementers_lists.openehr.org
<http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-implementers_lists.openehr.org>
--
Ing. Pablo Pazos Gutiérrez
Cel:(00598) 99 043 145
Skype: cabolabs
<http://cabolabs.com/>
http://www.cabolabs.com <http://www.cabolabs.com/>
pablo.pa...@cabolabs.com <mailto:pablo.pa...@cabolabs.com>
Subscribe to our newsletter <http://eepurl.com/b_w_tj>
_______________________________________________ openEHR-implementers
mailing list openEHR-implementers@lists.openehr.org
http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-implementers_lists.openehr.org
_______________________________________________
openEHR-implementers mailing list
openEHR-implementers@lists.openehr.org
http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-implementers_lists.openehr.org
