Thomas,
This sounds workable to me.  If I am understanding you correctly, we
need one (and only one??) registry in which anyone, anywhere (who is
authorized, of course) could look up a patient and determine which
"region" had master control at the moment over his record.  If I'm a
provider living in the region where the records are primarily managed,
then when my system attempted to look up, say, the date of his last
Tetanus vaccination, it would find it immediately.  If I was a provider
visited while the patient was traveling outside his "home" region, then
the same local query about his tetanus shot would tell me: "hold on a
minute, while we search all known registries to see where this guy's
home-region is... where his most current records will be located".  ...
and then my region does a full record update from the current home
region? or just try to display his tetanus vaccination history?

One of the problems alluded to is that different regions might be using
very different EHR structures.  Thus a simple "record refresh" in region
B from the information stored in Region A is not so simple.  It would
involve mappings at least, and possibly even data transformation.  The
inability to assume an overarching authority seems to be the Achilles
heel.  After a dozen record "movements" from one region to the next,
many little mapping and transformation errors may have accumulated to
thoroughly hose up the medical information in the patient's "master"
record.

One way around the central record managing authority would be to have
VERY FEW regions... each with a well organized regional authority... who
come together under a global organization and work out a very tight
choreography for these refresh/hand-off operations.  But this sounds
harder and no more likely to be created as one single authority such as
the UN imposing the requirements on all regions.

I believe that the most critical point for global standardization and
what we must aim for (first) is the information in the record.  When the
world has settled into that (something that will ALSO require a central
authority, but just for standardizing what the information elements
mean, not for choreographing complex record-merge operations), people
will gradually come around to the idea of moving to the next level of
system interoperability, with standard record structures.

With only the information standardized globally, two large and
cooperative regions (say, US and Australia) could still choose to create
a US-Aus. information authority and orchestrate a high level of
interoperability for patients and providers floating anywhere within our
two countries.  If the "functional regions" initially were more along
the sizes of counties and states, then we'd have a lot more hassle and
negotiating.  So I would suggest the world start with the largest sized
regions that could be reasonably managed with the same EHR structure.

The critical issue for all regional participants would be a strong,
competent regional authority... that operated in conformance to a set of
well defined "regional authority rules"... maintained by the UN??

Christopher J. Feahr, O.D.
Optiserv Consulting (Vision Industry)
Office: (707) 579-4984
Cell: (707) 529-2268
http://Optiserv.com
http://VisionDataStandard.org
----- Original Message ----- 
From: <lakew...@copper.net>
To: <openehr-technical at openehr.org>
Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 12:11 AM
Subject: Distributed Records - An approach


> Hi All,
>
> With a background in fault tolerant computing I have a built-in
penchant for
> distributed files that are exact/backup copies of a master. Works
wonders
> for
> financial transactions.
>
> I don't believe that this model fits EHRs especially since one can
conceive
> of
> parallel, e.g., close proximity in time, operations directed at
> modifications
> originating at geographically distant locations.These operations, even
they
> occur
> across town (Clinic and distant Lab) create problems for record
management.
>
> Tying record management to physical location is not a solution. Remote
> medicine complicates this immediately. However, a constant occurs
> immediately,
> presuming that we do not have to deal with human clones (put a
<dash-number>
> in the ID). The Patient ID is it. Traditional approaches would require
that
> in all
> the world there is only one unique person being considered.
(hopefully).
>
> Hence each region could contain entries on residents, transients,
visitors.
> tourists, etc. that somehow make contact with healthcare
> facilities/Practitioners
> in the region.
>
> Registering the IDs and updating the regional databases requires that
only
> those
> regional Patients be administered.
>
> National and international databases can be established that will
receive
> and store
> regional registrations of Patient IDs, allowing one to scan these
databases
> to
> determine who holds regional records on individual Patients. One can
then
> retrieve all the records or part of them. This substantially reduces
the
> need for
> storage and bandwidth to manage records on a global scale.
>
> I presume that there is no need to have matching records for
individual
> Patients
> in all regions this Patient has been in an made contact with the
healthcare
> industry. If I take a cruise on the Rhine and require medical
attention it
> makes no
> sense to burden whatever region manages that healthcare system with
anything
> more than they had a tourist with a weak stomach.
>
> It would be nice to have a distributed registry that would show where
I had
> to
> stop off and get some help. At least the Public Health personnel would
> appreciate
> it.
>
> The important thing to me is to be able to access all the known
records and
> bundle them in a way that is appropriate for the healthcare personnel
> handling
> my latest complaints.
>
> BTW: The Fault Tolerant/Highly Available Systems can make sure that
the
> information requested is available but the applications have to
structure
> it.
>
> -Thomas Clark
>
>
> -
> If you have any questions about using this list,
> please send a message to d.lloyd at openehr.org

-
If you have any questions about using this list,
please send a message to d.lloyd at openehr.org

Reply via email to