Dear colleagues,
This 'free text analysis tool' is a commercial product that will analys
"free text".
Ontologies, archetypes are of importance to increase further its analysis
capabilities.
So I must disappoint you the tool is not free.
But the use of archetypes as being specified in OpenEHR are important.
Gerard
-- <private> --
Gerard Freriks, arts
Huigsloterdijk 378
2158 LR Buitenkaag
The Netherlands
+31 252 544896
+31 654 792800
> From: Conrado Vi?a <conradov at adinet.com.uy>
> Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2003 00:50:47 -0300
> To: "Gerard Freriks" <gfrer at luna.nl>
> Cc: <openehr-technical at openehr.org>
> Subject: Free text analysis
>
> Hi All,
> I would like to ask Gerard Freriks to post some more information on the tool
> for free text analysis he mentioned.
>
> I think there is an influence on any EHR schema (even when built with
> archetypes) by the way chosen to retrieve the particular fragment of
> information. I also think archetypes could play an important role on future
> health-related free text analysis. That's why I thought my request was valid
> for a post.
>
> Since this is my first message to the list I think it appropriate to
> introduce myself (just a warning so I don't bore busy people with the rest
> of the e-mail)
>
> I'm a Systems Analyst working on an academic project for our country's main
> public hospital ("Hospital de Cl?nicas", Uruguay).
> Our work deals with the retrieval, analysis and integration of Epileptic
> patients clinical data. We evaluated the use of openEHR some months ago, but
> found too little empirical proof of its adequacy... :(
> We don't have our web page finished yet, and the first version is going to
> be in Spanish only, but I could send or post information on it when it's
> done, if I receive any request.
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Conrado Vi?a
>
>
> -----Mensaje original-----
> De: owner-openehr-technical at openehr.org
> [mailto:owner-openehr-technical at openehr.org] En nombre de Gerard Freriks
> Enviado el: lunes, 11 de agosto de 2003 19:36
> Para: Christopher Feahr; Thomas Clark
> CC: Karsten Hilbert; openehr-technical at openehr.org
> Asunto: Re: HISTORY DATA SET IN EPR
>
>
> Hi,
>
> As a GP with 20 years of experience in the Netherlands I learned that
> free text plus a not to complicated set of codes (ICPC) is sufficient
> for daily practice. We could generate automatic advice for medication
> based on complaints or diagnosis.
>
> ICPC contains roughly 2000 complaints, diagnoses and procedures. It will
> cover 80% of every thing a GP will encounter during the day.
>
> The provision of medicine is an art.
> The registration of all medical (and other) relevant facts and findings
> is retelling the story of the pati?nt. It is a narritive process. Have
> we ever seen a piece of literature completely written in complex codes?
>
> The study of Archetypes (see the OpenEHR website) will reveal that
> Archetypes plus free text plus codes will enable future physicians a lot
> of flexibility and expressive power. Much of the flexibility will depend
> on the ontology (medical knowledge and knwoledge of the world) behind
> the scenes.
>
> And bye the way.
> In the R&D facility where I work we have a very powerfull tool for
> analysis of free text. Recently a lot of progress has been been at this.
> If the free text is 'enriched' with Archetypes this process of
> meaningfull data extraction will become much more easy.
>
> Gerard Freriks
>
> --
> Gerard Freriks, MD
> Convenor CEN/TC251 WG1
>
> TNO-PG
> Zernikedreef 9
> Leiden
> The Netherlands
>
> +31 71 5181388
> +31 654 792800
>
>
>
>
> -- <private> --
> Gerard Freriks, arts
> Huigsloterdijk 378
> 2158 LR Buitenkaag
> The Netherlands
>
> +31 252 544896
> +31 654 792800
>
>
>> From: "Christopher Feahr" <chris at optiserv.com>
>> Organization: Optiserv Consulting
>> Reply-To: "Christopher Feahr" <chris at optiserv.com>
>> Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 07:32:52 -0700
>> To: "Thomas Clark" <lakewood at copper.net>
>> Cc: "Karsten Hilbert" <Karsten.Hilbert at gmx.net>,
>> <openehr-technical at openehr.org>
>> Subject: Re: HISTORY DATA SET IN EPR
>>
>> Presently, each doctor and EMR software vendor is cooking up his own
>> shorthand-language, and I'm suggesting that information should be
>> reduced as much as possible to a standard set of codes.
>
> -
> If you have any questions about using this list,
> please send a message to d.lloyd at openehr.org
>
>
>
>
-
If you have any questions about using this list,
please send a message to d.lloyd at openehr.org