Hello All,

I was just looking over W3C's Ontology Web Language (OWL), and was
wondering if anyone had thoughts on the subject as it related to
openEHR.  

Should openEHR archetypes be modeled using OWL or another "standard"
syntax?  

If openEHR archtypes are compatible with a standardized ontology
description language, then generic ontology viewing and manipulation
tools could be used on them.  

Perhaps the alternative of converting openEHR archetypes into OWL
representations with XSLT and then using generic tools is preferable?

Any ideas?

-Matias

============
Matias Klein
Ethidium Health Systems
1447 Rhoades Drive
Huntingdon Valley, PA 19006-2623
USA
http://www.ethidium.com




-
If you have any questions about using this list,
please send a message to d.lloyd at openehr.org

Reply via email to