On Thu, 2003-10-02 at 01:26, Thomas Beale wrote: > Dipak Kalra wrote: > > > Dear Tim, > > > > We have put quite some effort into the current complete wording, > > recognising the practical difficulty in distinguishing "commercial" > > from "non-commercial" purposes. I am not sure how much of the total > > wording you have seen, and it might well be that we have overlooked > > some issues for which I'd certainly be grateful for feedback. I shall > > first talk to Tom about what he has sent you so far, since we are both > > here in Aarhus for a few days, and then get back to you with some > > clarifications. > > > > (The scope of our present wording is limited to the web site and > > downloads, documentary materials and software components that do not > > include their source code. Suitable licences for source code is now > > the next matter receiving our attention.) > > After some discussions with Peter Schloeffel, Dipak Kalra, the consensus > seems to be that dual licencing replaces Mozilla effectively, so it > looks as if this is the way will we go - dual licence where the OS one > is the GPL. Obviously I was a bit out of the loop on this one - sorry > for any confusion. > > Your suggestions about where to include copyright notices are noted (and > understood - we just have not updated all the files - it is intended > that it will be done by scripts).
Excellent, all that sounds very satisfactory indeed from every possible point of view. -- Tim C PGP/GnuPG Key 1024D/EAF993D0 available from keyservers everywhere or at http://members.optushome.com.au/tchur/pubkey.asc Key fingerprint = 8C22 BF76 33BA B3B5 1D5B EB37 7891 46A9 EAF9 93D0 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: <http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20031002/6a52fd55/attachment.asc>
