Matias Klein wrote:

> Hello All,
>
> We are currently working on an oncology project in which medication 
> regimens are used.  I would appreciate some guidance on the preferred 
> way to model regimens using openEHR.  Here is an example of a regimen 
> I am modeling:

Matias,

Sam Heard will provide an answer to your question in a couple of days - 
he is currently in the UK after the recent CEN meeting, where apparently 
WG1 accepted the idea of including the ADL language specification in the 
standard as a normative part.

We have done some new work on how to represent the following kinds of 
drug regimens, and there will be a few changes to the openEHR reference 
model to support it. Not too drastic, but simplifying. Sam will provide 
a detailed response.

- thomas

>
> Regimen Name: CAF
> Step 1: Cyclophosphamide 100 mg/m2/day po days 1-14
> Step 2: Doxorubicin 30 mg/m2/day iv days 1 and 8
> Step 3: 5FU 500 mg/m2/day iv on days 1 and 8 repeat q 4 weeks
>
> As I see it, there are two possible models:
>
> 1.  One INSTRUCTION with an ITEM_TABLE data structure that has each 
> step in a different column.
>
> OR
>
> 2.  Three INSTRUCTIONs with LINKs between them (i.e. a "concurrent 
> medication order").  This would be very similar to the "chained 
> medication order" described in the EHR Information Model (Figure 27). 
> However in this case, the LINKs' meaning would be "concurrent actions" 
> rather than "next action".
>
> Does anyone have a preference or another way to model this?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Matias
>


-- 
___________________________________________________________________________________
CTO Ocean Informatics (http://www.OceanInformatics.biz)
Hon. Research Fellow, University College London

openEHR (http://www.openEHR.org)
Archetypes (http://www.oceaninformatics.biz/adl.html)
Community Informatics (http://www.deepthought.com.au/ci/rii/Output/mainTOC.html)


-
If you have any questions about using this list,
please send a message to d.lloyd at openehr.org

Reply via email to