Jim Alateras wrote: > Rong, > > I was looking thorough the Java ADL parser and it looks good. I have a > couple of questions > > 1. Do you have a URL for the ADL Specifications for v0.9?
No, I don't. It seems to be quite old, at least from 2003. What do you need it for? Our parser is mostly based on ADL 1.2 Draft, which is very close to the latest one - v1.2.1. > > 2. Do you have any plans for moving it towards v1.2? Certainly, we will bring it up to the latest ADL specification. Actually, the current ADL syntax supported by the parser is almost the same as that in the v1.2.1. Since the assertion package of archetype object model has gone through some major rewriting during the time the parser was constructed, the support of that in ADL is not supported by the parser( as well as the aom implementation in the kernel). What's also need to be improved is the post-parsing validation for stuff like missing term definition and wrong information model reference, which are beyond the BNF rules and need to verified after the object tree is constructed. However these won't stop you from creating serious archetypes to power your EHR application. With the current ADL parser and kernel, we have successfully created archetypes for Composition, Entry level objects and demographic objects like Person and use them for date entry and validation. Again, any help in terms of bug report, patches and improvements will be highly appreciated. Cheers, Rong > > > cheers > </jima> > > - > If you have any questions about using this list, > please send a message to d.lloyd at openehr.org > - If you have any questions about using this list, please send a message to d.lloyd at openehr.org
