On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 11:46:21PM +0100, Gerard Freriks wrote: > Bert, > > In what way do you suggest should CEN change the standard. > > Now is the time to make a proposal.
I can only talk about the things I have encountered, and my general impression for that small part I have seen, is that it has been well thinking, that has been done. As far as I can judge, which is not far, I am not a specialist for medical informatics. I am a programmer. And that is another point of view. I have some suggestions, I will come back to them later. But in two months or so, I will have some more suggestions. It is late, and tomorrow will be a long day. I come back to this question at the end of the week Thanks for asking Bert > > Gerard > > -- <private> -- > Gerard Freriks, arts > Huigsloterdijk 378 > 2158 LR Buitenkaag > The Netherlands > > +31 252 544896 > +31 654 792800 > On 15 Mar 2005, at 16:14, Bert Verhees wrote: > > > > This is done really smart in CEN, they have an EntityName, which > > consists of a > > set of EntityNameParts, the number is unlimited, but the > > qualifier-possibilities are limited. The only way is to add a > > qualifier, that > > is extending the standard > > - If you have any questions about using this list, please send a message to d.lloyd at openehr.org
