Hi! On Tue, 20 Sep 2005 15:35:08 +0200, Thomas Beale <Thomas.Beale at OceanInformatics.biz> wrote: > for the archetype editor, do those students want to work on the existing > code or write new code? There is already an effort underway
We are aware of the .NET version and UCL's corresponding Java project. Both those projects are used for inspiration and ideas. The students are allowed to use whatever they find useful in those projects. In our computer science master projects there must be a substantial design phase, so mainly implementing systems designed by others is not enough, they have to design large parts themselves. I believe their final product will reuse ideas from the existing editors but it will probably also contain new features and alternative ways of preforming archetype design tasks. > The existing editor currently talks to the JNI-wrapped Eiffel parser, > but we are also consindering making it talk to the a-code java parser. Their plan is to use the Java based parser from the start. (That has the additional benefit of avoiding platform dependendency) By the way, are there any important features missing in the Java based parser that are available in the .NET version? If so, are they hard to fix? > For the 3rd project, there is also work underway, which your students > may like to talk about - see > http://www.dualitysystems.com.au/archetypefinder/archetypefinder. This > portal screen is dynamically built from archetype meta-data. Great, thanks! I'm sure they will find it useful. Is the portal solution Open Source? Best Regards, Erik Sundvall, IMT, LiU, Sweden http://www.imt.liu.se/mi/ - If you have any questions about using this list, please send a message to d.lloyd at openehr.org
