Yes they are still 0.97 archetypes, but shouldn't they contain EVENT_CONTEXT
according to the old 0.9 specifications? Anyway, I'm glad that the release 1.0
archetypes are being published soon. I've had a look at some of the new
COMPOSITION archetypes and they seem to follow the specifications better.
Thanks,
Mattias
----- Original Message -----
From: Sam Heard
To: openehr-technical at openehr.org
Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2006 2:27 PM
Subject: Re: Question about Composition archetypes
Mattias
The Ocean archetypes are still 0.97 - we have updated all of them and will
have the release 1.0 tools and archetypes available very shortly.
The editor, alpha, on the Ocean site will create them in the release 1.0 form.
Cheers, Sam
Mattias Forss wrote:
Hello,
I've just compared some Composition archetypes from Ocean Informatics with
the specifications at openEHR.org and I have some questions. The specifications
from 0.9 to 1.0 all agree about one thing for COMPOSITION classes and that is
that the attribute "context" in the COMPOSITION class should point to a class
called EVENT_CONTEXT.
However, this is not the case for the archetypes I've seen so far. Instead,
the "context" attribute in the archetypes matches subclasses of ITEM_STRUCTURE
e.g. ITEM_TREE. These classes should instead be referred by an optional
attribute called "other_context" inside the EVENT_CONTEXT class. Can anyone
please explain to me why this is the case?
Regards,
Mattias
--
Dr. Sam Heard
MBBS, FRACGP, MRCGP, DRCOG, FACHI
CEO and Clinical Director
Ocean Informatics Pty. Ltd.
Adjunct Professor, Health Informatics, Central Queensland University
Senior Visiting Research Fellow, CHIME, University College London
Chair, Standards Australia, EHR Working Group (IT14-9-2)
Ph: +61 (0)4 1783 8808
Fx: +61 (0)8 8948 0215
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20060412/86e6edde/attachment.html>
