On 12/10/06, Thomas Beale <Thomas.Beale at oceaninformatics.biz> wrote: > > Mattias Forss wrote: > > > > > > It would be great if the archetypes could be updated soon. Could I get > > a listing of the changes so I can update the Java archetype editor > > accordingly? > Thanks mattias, > I think we should upload a set that have many/most of the improvements > your work has introduced, I hope in a week or less - the changes are > being done - just a lot of checking to do. But I think most of the pain > is over now...but you can feel sure that the annoyance value on your > part is not for nothing - we greatly appreciate your contributions and > patience.
I agree! :) Can I suggest that we put a minimum set of Archetypes for compatibility/interoperability test? Don't need to be clinical meaningful but should include all the possible features from the AOM and RM. /Rong - thomas > > > > _______________________________________________ > openEHR-technical mailing list > openEHR-technical at openehr.org > http://www.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20061214/7d05d6ca/attachment.html> -------------- next part -------------- _______________________________________________ openEHR-technical mailing list openEHR-technical at openehr.org http://www.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical
