The Ocean Terminology server takes care of archetype bindings to SNOMED 
terminology.
There is no free version of OTS however.

Regards,

O. Pishev,
Ocean Informatics


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Ruth Kidd" <[email protected]>
To: "For openEHR technical discussions" <openehr-technical at openehr.org>; 
<ian at mcmi.co.uk>
Sent: Saturday, December 16, 2006 12:39 AM
Subject: Re: Suggestions re Term binding in Archetype Editor


>>> This would be much easier within the editor if the Term bindings screen
>>> displayed the node name as well as the Node ID, as it is easy to forget
>>> which local term you are trying to bind by the time you have rummaged 
>>> around
>>> in Snomed for a bit!!
>
> I would definitely second this!
>
> -- 
> Regards
>
> Ruth Kidd
>
> HL7 Messaging Practitioner
> Communications and Messaging
> NHS Connecting for Health
>
> Tel: +44 (0)113 280 6599
> Mob: +44 (0)7798 781427
>
> Ruth.Kidd at nhs.net
> http://www.connectingforhealth.nhs.uk
>
> NHS Connecting for Health supports the NHS in providing better, safer
> care by delivering computer systems and services which improve the way
> patient information is stored and accessed.
>
>
> Ian McNicoll wrote:
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am currently working my way slowly through the Scottish Cardiac 
>> dataset,
>> converting it to archetypes as proof-of-concept, using the OE editor.
>>
>> Term binding (to SNOMED) will be a crucial aspect from our perspective,
>> especially binding local (interface) terms to SNOMED concepts.
>>
>> This would be much easier within the editor if the Term bindings screen
>> displayed the node name as well as the Node ID, as it is easy to forget
>> which local term you are trying to bind by the time you have rummaged 
>> around
>> in Snomed for a bit!!. The "Choose Nodes" dialog might also be a little
>> easier if the Node parent name and Node name were included. When only the
>> node name is visible this can cause confusion if similar local terms are
>> used for different nodes e.g. "Not known".
>>
>> Finally in the ADL, I think it would be very helpful to be able to 
>> include
>> the text of the Bound term text as well as its code. This would allow 
>> much
>> easier checking for errors and documenting
>>
>> I have done this by enclosing the bound term text in [] for now.
>>
>> e.g.
>>  term_binding = <
>> ["SNOMED-CT"] = <
>> items = <
>> ["at0000"] = <[SNOMED-CT::229819007 [Tobacco
>> use and Exposure]]>
>> ["at0006"] = <[SNOMED-CT::?Non Tobacco
>> user]>
>> ["at0009"] = <[SNOMED-CT::]>
>> ["at0011"] = <[SNOMED-CT::[Ex-smoker]
>> 8517006]>
>> ["at0012"] = <[SNOMED-CT::[Current
>> non-smoker] 160618006]>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Ian
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> openEHR-technical mailing list
>> openEHR-technical at openehr.org
>> http://www.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical
>
>
> **********************************************************************
> Information in this message  may contain  confidential and  privileged
> information.  If you are not  the intended recipient please accept our
> apologies; please do not disclose,  copy or distribute  information in
> this e-mail or take any  action in reliance on its  contents: to do so
> is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Please inform us that this
> message  has  gone  astray  before  deleting it.  Thank  you for  your
> co-operation.
>
> NHSmail is used daily by over 100,000 staff in the NHS. Over a million
> messages  are sent every day by the system.  To find  out why more and
> more NHS personnel are  switching to  this NHS  Connecting  for Health
> system please visit www.connectingforhealth.nhs.uk/nhsmail
> **********************************************************************
>
> _______________________________________________
> openEHR-technical mailing list
> openEHR-technical at openehr.org
> http://www.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical 
_______________________________________________
openEHR-technical mailing list
openEHR-technical at openehr.org
http://www.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical



Reply via email to