Tim Cook wrote: > >Hi Bert, > >I think you are still a bit confused about "What is OpenEHR?" > >See the FAQ: http://openehr.org/FAQs/t_about_FAQ.htm > >OpenEHR is (essentially) a non-profit organization that produces >specifications for an electronic health record. The specifications are >implementation generic documents. > > Maybe I am a bit confused, but I wrote two days ago, that OpenEhr was more an OpenConcept-project, instead of an OpenSource-project. There I was right, isn't it.
>Eiffel is used as the reference platform in order to prove that the >model actually is implementable (at a class level). > >The questions you are asking are implementation specific. I suggested >once before that you might join the implementers mailing list. Granted >there is much traffic there right now but really that is where these >discussion would make more sense. >http://openehr.org/advice/contents.html >Not to say that they are not supposed to be here on the technical list. >The description does still specify "software building". > >But on the implementers list you could address the fact that you want >help/collaboration with developers using Java, Hibernate and MySQL (if >those are your choices) to implement an OpenEHR server. > > I would be glad to work together with others, if possible. I am subscribed to the implementer list, but I never received one mail from that list. I looked in the archives, and the last message was from september last year (4 months ago). I am afraid not may people read my messages then, and it is more difficult to get the informations I need. <offtopic> It reminds me of a Linux list where they wanted to get all technical messages in a special list, and all association related messages to the main list. It didn't work, because no-one was reading the technical list, and all messages in the main list got the attentention, so people only interested only in association-news had to read their mail with a finger on the delete-button </offtopic> regards bert verhees
