Bert Verhees wrote: >Op woensdag 18 januari 2006 17:10, schreef Ian McNicoll MMS: > > >> > >Thanks Ian, thanks very much, for your clear answer. When there will come no >further mails which state different, I take your answer for truth. > >I guess I have to write it myself, or get help from people which already did. >The row-storage as from OpenSDE looks as a good solution. > > we can certainly share ideas from the UCL Java work. But you might have to wait a couple of weeks till I get back there and discover what state the code is in;-)
>But when this is true, and also what you state below, this means that there is >still a long way to go for OpenEhr before it will be implementable. > > Well, it's implementable now - it just is not implemented (completely) now. The .Net implementation we have in Australia already has a persistent back-end and some GUI. Some of it will be open sourced, but we need to find funding before that can happen. - thomas
