We have been using Gnu GPG to sign and encrypt clinical reports (HTML and
PDF files) before storing them on a central repository. The reports
integrity is checked each time someone asks to see a report. Our hospital
repository has more than 1.500.000 reports.

Hope this information helps.

-----------------------------
Ricardo Correia
Fac. Medicina - Univ. Porto
Portugal

-----Mensagem original-----
De: owner-openehr-technical at openehr.org
[mailto:owner-openehr-technical at openehr.org] Em nome de Thomas Beale
Enviada: quarta-feira, 28 de Junho de 2006 15:09
Para: Openehr-Technical
Assunto: potential use of openPGP in openEHR


An initial suggestion (currently in the Release 1.0.1 candidate drafts) 
is that openPGP should be used in openEHR for generating digests and 
signatures. openPGP is defined at http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2440.txt 
and a lot of other information can be found at http://www.pgpi.org/ , 
http://www.gnupg.org/ .

My proposal is that the openPGP message specification makes sense for 
defining signature and hash values in openEHR because openPGP fully 
defines the result string ("message"), and allows for a wide choice of 
algorithms. It is also nice in that the result can be a single string, 
and is self-describing - i.e. decoding software can just read the string 
to find out what algorithms were used, and apply them. ASCII armoring 
and radix-64 encoding mean that "safe" strings can be generated.

However, we also have to be mindful of how it can be implemented in all 
major OSs and languages. Gnu GPG is one approach, but I don't have any 
direct experience of it.

Currently, hashing and signing are completely optional in openEHR 
(probably they will always be). But I believe we need to support them 
clearly in the openEHR architecture for those users that do want them. I 
also believe that we need to specify an open standard for hashing and 
signing and related security things.

Lastly, the use of such security algorithms interacts with the notion of 
key certication and a PKI. My understanding is that openPGP does not 
force users into any particular model of key management (even if the PGP 
distributed model might be easiest to itegrate). Do others have 
experience with openPGP within a PKI?

- thomas beale

-- 
____________________________________________________________________________
_______
CTO Ocean Informatics (http://www.OceanInformatics.biz)
Research Fellow, University College London (http://www.chime.ucl.ac.uk)
Chair Architectural Review Board, openEHR (http://www.openEHR.org)


Reply via email to