In een bericht met de datum 6-11-2006 15:57:47 West-Europa (standaardtijd), schrijft rong.acode at gmail.com:
> > I also think there is a need to support cacluated fields based on other > fields in the archetype. It's possible to express that with assertation, but > it's > just for validation purpose. It would be nice to have the possibility to > specify a node whose value is cacluated by a given algorithm on other > exsiting > values for presentation. Maybe it could be something for templates? > > Cheers, > Rong > > I believe that this is an important work in the area of OpenEHR and HL7 v3 harmonization. Many of the requested things can be organised in V3 spec and could contribute to OpenEHR materials vice versa. William Goossen -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20061106/2a606f45/attachment.html> -------------- next part -------------- _______________________________________________ openEHR-technical mailing list openEHR-technical at openehr.org http://www.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical
