Hi,
I started wondering about different representations of ISM_TRANSITIONs of
the ism_transition attribute in the ACTION archetypes. I found that the
below example:
ISM_TRANSITION matches {
current_state matches {
CODED_TEXT matches {
code matches {[openehr::524]}
}
}
careflow_step matches {
CODED_TEXT matches {
code matches {[local::at0001]} -- Planned
}
}
}
ISM_TRANSITION matches {
current_state matches {
CODED_TEXT matches {
code matches {[openehr::524]}
}
}
careflow_step matches {
CODED_TEXT matches {
code matches {[local::at0004]} -- Requested
}
}
}
could be compressed into this:
ISM_TRANSITION matches {
current_state matches {
CODED_TEXT matches {
code matches {[openehr::524]}
}
}
careflow_step matches {
CODED_TEXT matches {
code matches {[local::at0001, -- Planned
at0004]} -- Requested
}
}
}
The examples have the same semantic meaning. However, at data entry the
second example would mean that a choice must be made concerning the
careflow_step, i.e. either at0001 or at0004. Should the archetype editors
support both examples? The first example is the only one I've seen in
archetypes...
Regards,
Mattias
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20061031/157cba55/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
_______________________________________________
openEHR-technical mailing list
openEHR-technical at openehr.org
http://www.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical
