Williamtfgoossen at cs.com wrote: > > Yes, it is currently not possible in the archetype editor to define > the goal of an instrument, have a abstract of the evidence base in the > clinical world underpinning it, work instructions, interpretation > guidelines, references to the literature or websites per archetype. It > should not be too difficult to add this and then it would be useful > tool for any standard development once Grahame Greave has done his > tooling work. >
Hi William, Since I am not 100% sure of the details of what you want to do, I won't make any claims yet, but it seems to me that the archetype "description" section (i.e. the meta-data in an archetype) is the place where you can reference online and other resources (e.g. guidelines, medline content) used to build or otherwise related to the archetype. See here for this information being displayed in an archetype (it happens that in this archetype the "resources" fields are empty, but they are there) - http://svn.openehr.org/ref_impl_eiffel/TRUNK/apps/doc/images/description_1.png . The meta-data design is based on CEN and CDA meta-data specifications. Looking at the latest version of the Archetype Editor, it seems that the resources fields cannot be edited directly yet - this functionality needs to be added. Would this address the need in this area? As for the "goal of an instrument" - I am not sure what you mean - can you explain a bit further? - thomas -- ___________________________________________________________________________________ CTO Ocean Informatics (http://www.OceanInformatics.biz) Research Fellow, University College London (http://www.chime.ucl.ac.uk) Chair Architectural Review Board, openEHR (http://www.openEHR.org)
