Hello,
I am completely okay with T Baele.
We have in France a comparable debate with the DMP project (Personal Medical
record).
The physician needs information under shape of documents.He/it wants them
quickly and sure being that the content is reliable to be able to take a
decision or to prescribe a treatment.
For he/it is asked to the physician to be the supplier of data to put medicine
in a system of information for decision-makers, payers or political. It is
another probl?me.....

Dr R LONJON france




Selon Thomas Beale <Thomas.Beale at oceaninformatics.biz>:

> Williamtfgoossen at cs.com wrote:
> >
> >
> > So the 'standard' approach is:
> >
> > one patient with
> > one or more diseases
> > and none to many associated problems / complaints
> > and none to many associated nursing diagnoses / allied health problems
> > and one to many activities for the disease (s)
> > and one to many activities for the associated problems (the minimum,
> > so always one has to be there is to monitor the onset of a potential
> > problem)
> > and one to many activities for the associated nursing diagnoses /
> > allied health problems.
> >
> > Definitely this is is with respect to workflow a difficult non-linear
> > process of care delivery and of changes of the disease(s) and the
> > different problem situations.
> > Thus we need to be able to have a system that can track what these
> > changes are, and what the status of this set of mixed activities is.
> > We must also be able to exchange this in the multitude of systems
> > available in health care that will last for several decades.
> >
> > I am pretty sure that I can deal with these complex situations in HL7
> > v3 speak. I have not seen examples of these complex care situations in
> > 13606 speak since that is missing examples from health care with this
> > respect.
> Hi William,
>
> the workflow aspects of the above need workflow languages and service
> models to support multi-enterprise choreography. There are guideline and
> workflow languages (not provided by HL7 or openEHR), and the beginnings
> of models for choreography coming from WfMC and other places. I can't
> think of much HL7 provides in this area. But the main question with
> respect to workflow is: what needs to be automated? Humans are far
> better at performing real-world tasks than machines, due to their
> ability to handle exceptional cases. Mostly what we need to solve right
> now is:
> - clinical content
> - simple workflow around medication prescription and management
> - some basic workflow around admission, discharge, referral
>
> Other workflows are wonderful problems for computer science theses, but
> mostly are done better and more economically by human beings at the
> moment. If we just get clinical content solved, that will be a huge step.
> >
> > Perhaps we need to work more from the clincial perspective and
> > determine the requirements and from there to the technical bits.
> exactly...
>
> - thomas
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> openEHR-technical mailing list
> openEHR-technical at openehr.org
> http://www.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical
>


--

Reply via email to