Hi Daniel, I would suggest that you re-post this on the clinical mailing list.
Cheers, Tim On Mon, 2007-12-03 at 12:55 +0100, Daniel Karlsson wrote: > Dear Everyone, > > Background: > We are in Sweden starting a number of clinical archetype-construction > projects and we are hoping to re-use as much as possible from the > openEHR repository by specialisation. > > So to my problem: > Looking at the openEHR-EHR-OBSERVATION.body_weight.v1 archetype > (hereafter named BW) and the > openEHR-EHR-OBSERVATION.body_weight-birth.v1 archetype (BWB), BWB does > not seem to be a specialisation of BW. BWB specifies the event to be > birth and clothing state to be naked, but relaxes the unit restriction > to allow grams (with "g" as the abbreviated from, not "gm", see ISO > Guide 31, item 3.1-a). > > Then to my specific questions: > 1. Are the BW and BWB wrong and should be corrected? > 2. Can BWB be understood without BW or must each restriction be stated > explicitly? E.g., does BWB inherit the protocol restriction from BW? > 3. What about weight gain and weight loss in BW? > > Best Regards, > Daniel -- Timothy Cook, MSc Health Informatics Research & Development Services LinkedIn Profile:http://www.linkedin.com/in/timothywaynecook ************************************************************* * If this email contained any confidential information it * * would have been encrypted with the receipient's Public * * GPG key as well as being signed by my personal GPG key. * * So, you wouldn't be reading this anyway. You may get my * * Public GPG key from popular keyservers or from this link * * http://timothywayne.cook.googlepages.com/home * *************************************************************
