Thomas Beale wrote:
> Adam Flinton wrote:
>>
>>
>> I reserve my views wrt attributes vs text() however that would do on
>> the proviso of a bit of testing with many tools as it used to be
>> patchily supported by different tools.
>>
>> I accept that was a few years back & things may well have improved.
>>
>> So then next question then is when will the tools support this?
>>
> looks like we have arrived at a useful point - first thing we need is
> an analysis of changes to the XML-schemas. If Lisa's change is all
> that is needed and someone wants to update the current schemas to make
> thi work, we can put it on the main TRUNK so that everyone can have
> access to it.
>
> Further analysis will be needed for the tools, but I would not expect
> big problems. Generally they are using orthodox XML parsers whcih I
> assume respect the whitespace settings in an XML schema...
>
> - thomas
>
>
I would like though to enquire wrt the rationale of containing _id info
in a separate <value/> element.
If you are being consistent
instead of :
<terminology_id>
<value>ISO_639-1</value>
</terminology_id>
it should be simply:
<terminology_id>ISO_639-1</terminology_id>
or <terminology_id value="ISO_639-1"/>
Adam
**********************************************************************
This message may contain confidential and privileged information.
If you are not the intended recipient please accept our apologies.
Please do not disclose, copy or distribute information in this e-mail
or take any action in reliance on its contents: to do so is strictly
prohibited and may be unlawful. Please inform us that this message has
gone astray before deleting it. Thank you for your co-operation.
NHSmail is used daily by over 100,000 staff in the NHS. Over a million
messages are sent every day by the system. To find out why more and
more NHS personnel are switching to this NHS Connecting for Health
system please visit www.connectingforhealth.nhs.uk/nhsmail
**********************************************************************
