hey Sam I'll bite ;-)
> but the openEHR data types are ready for > archetypes and the cluster element (leaf node) architecture. it you want, we can go round and round on semantic issues. Always a pleasure ;-). But is there anything specific that makes you think that it would be inappropriate or unwise to use the iso datatypes in the document with 13606? (so not including general issues) Grahame Sam Heard wrote: > Dear All > > I have been at the CEN working group meetings representing Standards > Australia. > It is clear to me that CEN needs to take on the openEHR data types in order > to > progress quickly. The ISO data types are likely to be appropriate for the HL7 > environment and will map to openEHR - but the openEHR data types are ready > for > archetypes and the cluster element (leaf node) architecture. > > You can have a look at the ISO data type proposal likely to come through HL7 > soon at: > > http://informatics.mayo.edu/wiki/index.php/ISO_Datatypes > > user name: wiki > > password: wikiwiki > > > It will be helpful to make your views known on this list. > > Cheers, Sam > -- o _______________________________________________ openEHR-clinical mailing list openEHR-clinical at openehr.org http://www.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical
