I think I understand. Thanks. What actually gets persisted, I suspect, are the paths--and values pointed to by those paths--implicit in your archetype object graph, correct? And to convert AQL query into an SQL query you somehow extract that path from AQL and convert it into some sort of SQL, right? Is there anything on your web site about this, about deriving a DB query from an archtype query?
>You can have whatever persistence layer as long as it can get expected results back based on the AQL statement. --That's the question. How do you "get expected results back based on the AQL Statement? Thanks, Randy Neall On 11/5/07, Chunlan Ma <chunlan.ma at oceaninformatics.com> wrote: > > > > > > *From:* openehr-technical-bounces at openehr.org [mailto: > openehr-technical-bounces at openehr.org] *On Behalf Of *Randolph Neall > *Sent:* Tuesday, November 06, 2007 3:35 AM > *To:* For openEHR technical discussions > *Subject:* Re: OpenEHR queries > > > > As a developer from the US who sometimes tries to follow discussions here, > I have a question probably well answered if I took more time myself to find > the answer. Against what do your archetype queries run? Against the DB > itself or some representation of the data in memory? I ask because a few > months ago, someone from openEHR said in one of the discussions that a DB > schema is not part of openEHR, that some private participant in openEHR had > one for sale, and Ocean, maybe, but that was it. So, again against what do > these queries (see example in Chunlan Ma's message below) run? > > > > That's good question. You've noticed that I didn't mention anything about > the data store here. In general, query languages are designed specifically > for a type of data store. For instance, SQL is run against relational > databases. XQuery is run against XML structured data. Object Oriented Query > Language need to be run against Object oriented database management systems > etc. These types of query language are data query languages, i.e. they > query at the data level. You have to know DB schema when you write a SQL > query statement. > > > > Archetype Query Language is different from the general query languages. > It's a semantic query language, i.e. it queries data at semantic level. > It's neutral to persistence layer and system design. We only need to use > archetype path and openEHR reference model to construct AQL statement. You > can have whatever persistence layer as long as it can get expected results > back based on the AQL statement. That's why AQL queries can be shared > across systems and enterprise boundaries. Sharing AQL is one of the key > solution to achieve semantic interoperability. > > > > Cheers, > > Chunlan > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Randy Neall > > Veriqant, L.L.C. > > > > > > On 11/4/07, *Chunlan Ma* <chunlan.ma at oceaninformatics.com> wrote: > > Hi Greg, > > Rong has indicated there is a paper about archetype query language. Thanks > Rong. That paper introduced basic query syntax. It was written at the > beginning of this year. The query syntax has been enriched recently in > order > to support more complicated queries. I've already started to write the > specifications, but need to resolve some known issues before release. > > Anyway, I handcrafted the following queries for you (I cannot build my > query > builder at the moment because of some integration issues). > > The query statement below shows that all observation instances with > respiratory rate greater than n will be returned. > > SELECT o > FROM EHR e[ehr_id/value=$ehrId] CONTAINS COMPOSITION CONTAINS OBSERVATION > o[openEHR-EHR-OBSERVATION.respiration.v1.adl] > WHERE o/data/events[at0002]/data[at0003]/items[at0004]/value/magnitude>n > AND > o/data/events[at0002]/data[at0003]/items[at0004]/value/units = '/min' > > If you want the respiratory quantity object been returned, the query would > look like: > > SELECT o/data/events[at0002]/data[at0003]/items[at0004]/value > FROM EHR e[ehr_id/value=$ehrId] CONTAINS COMPOSITION CONTAINS OBSERVATION > o[openEHR-EHR-OBSERVATION.respiration.v1.adl] > WHERE o/data/events[at0002]/data[at0003]/items[at0004]/value/magnitude>n > AND > o/data/events[at0002]/data[at0003]/items[at0004]/value/units = '/min' > > Just for your information, the single letter 'o' is the observation class > variable name, "/data/events[at0002]/data[at0003]/items[at0004]/value" is > the archetype path to respiratory quantity node. If you have the archetype > > workbench running, you can identify this path there. '$ehrId' is the > parameter name which can be substituted with real EHR ehr_id value at run > time. The query language supports parameterization. > > Some archetype query statements would be very long if the query criteria > are > complicated. In fact, we don't need to write the above queries by hand. > Ocean Informatics has implemented a tool - Archetype Query Builder, which > can be used to create/edit queries easily. Additionally, Ocean has also > implemented a query parser and query engine as well. > > The above query statements are consistent to the query syntax introduced > by > the MedInfo paper. The current query tools also support this query syntax. > However, as I have said that we have enriched the query syntax and all the > enhancements can be found from the query specifications. > > Hope this helps. > > Regards, > Chunlan > > -----Original Message----- > From: openehr-technical-bounces at openehr.org > [mailto:openehr-technical-bounces at openehr.org] On Behalf Of Greg Caulton > Sent: Monday, November 05, 2007 6:48 AM > To: openEHR-technical at openehr.org > Subject: OpenEHR queries > > Hi, > > Somewhere I recall reading that there was an OpenEHR query that > theoretically an OpenEHR compliant system could execute a return > results for. > > Is there a spec somewhere, preferably with a simple example. > > So if someone knew my patient and queried for all instances of > Respiratory Rate greater than n? > > openEHR-EHR-OBSERVATION.respiration.v1.adl > > Rate at0004 > n > Units /min (is that a default or are the units passed in the query) > > Or is this future functionality? > > thanks > > Greg > > http://www.patientos.org > _______________________________________________ > openEHR-technical mailing list > openEHR-technical at openehr.org > http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical > _______________________________________________ > openEHR-technical mailing list > openEHR-technical at openehr.org > http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical > > > > _______________________________________________ > openEHR-technical mailing list > openEHR-technical at openehr.org > http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20071105/18b7507e/attachment.html>
