Hi! I know that it is technically possible. ;-) I was trying to ask if it was clinically possible to identify clusters etc in this specific case. Sorry for not being specific enough in the question.
After I asked some good suggestions regarding template use have been posted as a good reminder that there is usually more than one solution. Thanks! // Erik > Erik Sundvall wrote: > > Can one share important sub-parts without sharing view on process and > > structure. If so, will the information entered using the two different > > archetypes be computable in a similar way for e.g. decision support > > systems. On 10/18/07, Thomas Beale <thomas.beale at oceaninformatics.com> wrote: > this is why we have Cluster & Structure archetypes that are routinely > shared via slots in various other archetypes - it provides a high degree > of re-use, just as for classes referencing other classes (assocation, > aggregation) in the object paradigm .
