HI, It is optional as I happen to remember.
So when there is an archtyped one, so the better. Standards are conservative documents. Gerard On 21, Apr, 2008, at 17:30 , Erik Sundvall wrote: > P.s. Whatever happened to the demographics package when running it > through the CEN standardisation-process? A brief look at the > EN13606-spec gives the impression that they have hardcoded a number of > field into theit RM instead of using archetyping, is this correct? Why > on earth...? > It even looked like there are no places to add new archetyped > structures (like ITEM_STRUCTURE) anywhere in the 13606 demographics > package, is this correct? > ______________________ -- <private> -- Gerard Freriks, MD Huigsloterdijk 378 2158 LR Buitenkaag The Netherlands T: +31 252544896 M: +31 620347088 E: gfrer at luna.nl Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety. Benjamin Franklin 11 Nov 1755 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20080421/e1838a99/attachment.html>
