Has this email gotten through? Wondering since Sam recently described problems with the list (Eric's SNOMED post).
Is my assumption regarding MOF (see below) right? ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Thilo Schuler <[email protected]> Date: Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 4:12 PM Subject: Re: AOM MOF mapping To: For openEHR technical discussions <openehr-technical at openehr.org> Adam & Sam This is very interesting, kind of relates to my recent post "MDA/MDD & DSL". For my med student brain I want to clarify that I get what Adam suggests. MOF has the idea of 4-layer meta-modelling. In the case of AOM/MOF mapping this would lead to this: m3 (meta-metamodel) -> MOF m2 (metamodel) -> AOM and RM (?) [expressed as instance of MOF] m1 (model) -> Archetypes m0 (data) -> Archetype instances Is that correct? I am especially curious whether the Reference Model (RM) as indicated above also needs to be expressed as MOF in the m2 layer. I would presume so. As Adam, suggested it makes sense to used the EMF infrastructure & tools (e.g. have a look at the screen-video http://redmonk.com/tv/eclipse-emf-demo-large/ ) as their meta-metamodel Ecore is supposed to be pretty much EMOF (essential MOF) compliant. @Sam: If I understand you correctly your trial design starts with an CCR-openEHR-template (i.e. several aggregated archetypes plus maybe further constraints). This would be the m1-layer. Before we could do that we would have to create the generic m2-layer. Thilo On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 2:26 PM, Sam Heard <sam.heard at oceaninformatics.com> wrote: > > Hi Adam > > This is something we would very much like to do. I would propose the > following senario: > > > Develop a template for CCR > > Document it (html) and enable data entry > > Transform the template to MOF > > Create data against the MOF > > Transform the data entered against the template to CDA > Compare the data This would seem useful as a trial. > > Cheers, Sam > > > > Adam Flinton wrote: > In a reply wrt "On Information and Interoperability" I have noted that > there is a move underway to try & produce an HL7 model (via EMF/MOF) for > use in our /OHT eclipse tooling. > > Has anyone looked at an AOM/MOF mapping? > > If so any thoughts? > > E.g. were one to want to sit down & do some Eclipse OpenEHR tooling then > an obvious contender would be the Eclipse EMF/GMF & that would require a > AOM<>EMF mapping & given EMF is a subset of MOF then ....etc. > > Adam > > ********************************************************************** > This message may contain confidential and privileged information. > If you are not the intended recipient please accept our apologies. > Please do not disclose, copy or distribute information in this e-mail > or take any action in reliance on its contents: to do so is strictly > prohibited and may be unlawful. Please inform us that this message has > gone astray before deleting it. Thank you for your co-operation. > > NHSmail is used daily by over 100,000 staff in the NHS. Over a million > messages are sent every day by the system. To find out why more and > more NHS personnel are switching to this NHS Connecting for Health > system please visit www.connectingforhealth.nhs.uk/nhsmail > ********************************************************************** > > _______________________________________________ > openEHR-technical mailing list > openEHR-technical at openehr.org > http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical > > > > > > -- > > Dr Sam Heard > Chief Executive Officer > Ocean Informatics > Director, openEHR Foundation > Senior Visiting Research Fellow, University College London > Aus: +61 4 1783 8808 > UK: +44 77 9871 0980 > _______________________________________________ > openEHR-technical mailing list > openEHR-technical at openehr.org > http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical > >
