At the moment I would say that we are not too far off where you want to go. As you know there are a couple of efforts to produce an up-to-date tool-based UML expression of openEHR. Hopefully one or both will come to fruition quickly. >From there we can add in the TOM part of the model, which as you can see from the draft is only a small number of classes.
- thomas beale > Thomas Beale wrote: > > Adam Flinton wrote: > > > >> Preferably in Eclipse UML2...? > >> > >> If so does it then include the archetypes class model as well? > >> > >> > >> > >> > > *The UML for the forthcoming openEHR template model is online in the > > latest AOM draft (some changes to AOM of ADL 1.4 vintage) and Templates > > draft, available at the page > > http://www.openehr.org/wiki/display/spec/openEHR+Templates+and+Specialised+Archetypes > > > > However, if you are after UML for the current .oet file format, I don't > > think it is published, but I would imagine it already exists - > > publishing it should be no problem. Can you indicate which one you are > > after? > > > > - thomas beale > > > > * > > > > _______________________________________________ > > openEHR-technical mailing list > > openEHR-technical at openehr.org > > http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical > > > Sorry for the delay. > > What I was wondering about is whether we had/could have a complete model > for OpenEHR Templates + Archetypes. > > i.e. if one had the AOM in Eclipse XMI then one could generate Java > classes or <insert language of choice here> > > e.g. > > http://www.eclipse.org/modeling/m2t/?project=jet > > or if you want to go the whole hog: > > http://www.openarchitectureware.org/ > > & one could create Graphical editors via GMF, compare models, run OCL > constraints etc.etc. > > What is more, maintaining the AOM /TOM via the Eclipse UML tools means > that the model is machine readable/processable and the tooling is > free/open source (though you could use tooling based on the eclipse UML > e.g. Rational etc.) > > It also means that the model can be maintained with a degree of > isolation from persistence formats per se via OAW mappers etc allowing > one to bring in/emit differing versions of ADL, differing versions of > templates etc. > > We are nearly there wrt the AOM. What we are lacking is a UML class > model of the "TOM". > > So if you have the UML class diagram for Templates, that would be great. > If it's already in Eclipse XMI/UML that would be even better. > > Adam > > *********************************************************************** > This message may contain confidential and privileged information. > If you are not the intended recipient you should not disclose, copy > or distribute information in this e-mail or take any action in reliance > on its contents. To do so is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. > Please inform the sender that this message has gone astray before > deleting it. Thank you. > > 2008 marks the 60th anniversary of the NHS. It's an opportunity to pay > tribute to the NHS staff and volunteers who help shape the service, and > celebrate their achievements. > > If you work for the NHS and would like an NHSmail email account, go > to: www.connectingforhealth.nhs.uk/nhsmail > *********************************************************************** > > _______________________________________________ > openEHR-technical mailing list > openEHR-technical at openehr.org > http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical -- Thomas Beale Chief Technology Officer Ocean Informatics
