The grammar (pasted in the spec) for the use_node
slot refers to object_path which is not actually
defined in the path grammar. Furthermore, I can't
actually tell from the spec whether use_node
is restricted to absolute paths, or whether it can
also accept relative paths.

archetype_internal_ref:
  SYM_USE_NODE type_identifier c_occurrences object_path

So obviously the grammar needs to be updated to
use the right path rule, but I am also thinking that
perhaps the use_node section needs some
explanation of what types of paths are allowed
to be used and what the ramifications are
if relative paths are also acceptable.

Andrew

Reply via email to