> Hola Pablo, > > there have been some discussions about the demographics on this list > recently. Please have a look at the list archive > http://www.nabble.com/openEHR-f18276.html > > You can find some demographics archetypes here: > http://www.openehr.org/svn/knowledge/archetypes/dev/adl/openehr/demographic/
Too bad that these demographic archetypes contain links to not (yet) published demographic archetypes. In my opinion, Openehr has everything to be good at demographic data, but for some strange reasons this subject does not get the attention it ought to get. Not in published archetypes, not in the archetype-editors, even there were promises to change that, even a year ago. (/I tried to expand the ocean archetype editor so it would support demographic archetypes, which does not seem to hard to me, but sadly, Mono is not yet enough up to date with MS dotnet, so I gave up for now/). There are more change situations regarding to demographic archetypes, but I I hope this situation will change. regards Bert > > Best regards > Hans > > Pab schrieb: >> Hi, >> >> I've started working on an EHR project at national level in my >> country. The people here knows only about HL7 and IHE, but OpenEHR is >> not so popular. I've been follow OpenEHR since 2006, when with Rodrigo >> Filgueira we made a prototype of an ICU system with the OpenEHR >> Information Model. >> >> This is the first email of a list of emails I have to send to you to >> make a correct evaluation of OpenEHR and to have solid information to >> propose it to my coleagues on the project (I don't make the decisions >> so I need to convince my coleagues). I think OpenEHR has very good >> ideas and concepts and it's reasonably stable and mature, but some >> issues are not so clear or not so mature (IMHO), now I can think of >> two things: the template specification and template tools >> and archetype/template versioning. Later I'll ask you about these >> subjects, know I need some words about another subject. >> >> At this time, we are making a prototype of a Master Patient Index >> system, at this time the only specifications and standards that are >> over the table are IHE (the PIX profile) and HL7 for messaging. I need >> to know what is the experience on this subject using OpenEHR (I know >> that Ocean Informatics has its own MPI system, is it based on OpenEHR >> IM and AOM?), if someone has build an MPI please leave some lines on >> the subject: what problems do you have? what archetypes do you use? >> etc etc. >> >> I want to propose something like the IHE transactions but implemented >> with OpenEHR messages based on demographic archetypes (something like >> the Patient Administration domain of HL7, that defines messages with >> demographic data). I see that here *MailScanner has detected a >> possible fraud attempt from "www.openehr.org" claiming to be* >> http://wwwopenehr.org/clinicalmodels/archetypes.html >> <http://www.openehr.org/clinicalmodels/archetypes.html> are some >> demographic archetypes but the links are broken. Are this archetypes >> stable? are them complete? (they have all the demographic data that is >> needed: ids, names, contact mediums, address or some kind >> of geo-referenced location, etc, etc). >> >> >> Please drop me a line on these subjects, >> thanks a lot! >> >> Cheers, >> Pablo. >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> openEHR-technical mailing list >> openEHR-technical at openehr.org >> http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical >> > > _______________________________________________ > openEHR-technical mailing list > openEHR-technical at openehr.org > http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical >
