Thomas Beale wrote:
> *The following permits v1, etc, since in **V_NONZERO_DIGIT [ V_NUMBER ]
> the latter part is optional.*
> *
> version_id: ?v? V_NONZERO_DIGIT [ V_NUMBER ] [ ?.? V_NUMBER [ ?.?
> V_NUMBER ] ]
>
> V_NONZERO_DIGIT: [1-9]
> V_NUMBER: [0-9]+

Ah yes, good point.

This all looks correct to me then.

- Peter 



Reply via email to