Thomas Beale wrote: > *The following permits v1, etc, since in **V_NONZERO_DIGIT [ V_NUMBER ] > the latter part is optional.* > * > version_id: ?v? V_NONZERO_DIGIT [ V_NUMBER ] [ ?.? V_NUMBER [ ?.? > V_NUMBER ] ] > > V_NONZERO_DIGIT: [1-9] > V_NUMBER: [0-9]+
Ah yes, good point. This all looks correct to me then. - Peter

