Tim Cook wrote (hidden away inside a text attachment): > I also note that some of the ADL files are intended to be tests. My > feeling is that some of these have been around for some time and may not > be truly 'test' files. Should they be removed or updated? I vote for > updated. A set of really good test ADL files are essential and will > really simplify the work of openEHR developers.
The archetypes at http://www.openehr.org/wsvn/knowledge/archetypes/dev/adl/test/validation/?rev=0&sc=0 were all written a couple of months ago. Most of them contain deliberate errors, in order to test whether validation is working. I haven't had a really close look at the other test directories, but having worked with them in an ad-hoc way they seem ok. A thorough review of all of the test archetypes would be welcome, of course! - Peter
