Stef Verlinden wrote: > Hi Sebastian, > > Op 21 dec 2009, om 08:50 heeft Sebastian Garde het volgende geschreven: > > >> A Cluster you could "plugin" anywhere within an archetype e.g. >> somewhere deep down in the data, protocol or state, an ITEM_TREE (or >> any other structure archetype such as ITEM_LIST, ITEM_SINGLE and >> ITEM_TABLE) where an ITEM_* structure is expected - e.g. the top- >> level of data, protocol, state >> > > Is there a specific reason for this of is is just to keep an archetype > 'tidy'? > The way I understand it (and I hope Tom will correct me if I am wrong) is that the ITEM_STRUCTURE classes are a bit more powerful - http://www.openehr.org/uml/release-1.0.1/Browsable/_9_0_76d0249_1109066824738_487684_2609Report.html
ITEM_TREE is closest to CLUSTER, ITEM_LIST, ITEM_SINGLE, ITEM_TABLE differ slightly, but can all be converted to a CLUSTER using the asHierarchy() operation. Cheers Sebastian -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20091221/df34d130/attachment.html>
