On Tue, 2009-02-03 at 17:28 +0100, Bert Verhees wrote: > > actually, I would only agree at the level of major version - there are > > archetypes around that started life when Release 1.0.1 was the latest, > > and may not be finished until Release 1.0.2 is already issued. It most > > likely makes no difference to the authors. > > > Exactly what I mean, we must agree, which part of the version-number > indicates a possible incompatibility concernig archetypes/RM-version. > Bert
Don't try to get too complicated. Just have a list that states that this archetype has been validated against these RM versions. If my RM version is in the list I okay. There aren't going to be too many RM versions anyway. --Tim -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: <http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20090203/494f6f19/attachment.asc>
