This is really an implementer's question but I'd like opinions from everyone on it.
ADL files carry the adl version as well as the reference model name that the archetype was built against. With the ARB starting on release 1.1 and it looks like there may be changes that impact software. I wonder if we should raise a CR for 1.1 that adds the RM version number to the ADL as well? While I know that the ARB will do everything possible to not break backwards compatibillity. It could be useful for the software to be able to tell which RM version an archetype was built against. Cheers, Tim -- Timothy Cook, MSc Health Informatics Research & Development Services LinkedIn Profile:http://www.linkedin.com/in/timothywaynecook Skype ID == timothy.cook ************************************************************** *You may get my Public GPG key from popular keyservers or * *from this link http://timothywayne.cook.googlepages.com/home* ************************************************************** -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: oe_trick.png Type: image/png Size: 7092 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20090201/d6439a5c/attachment.png> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: <http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20090201/d6439a5c/attachment.asc>
