Thanks Helma, Very interesting feedback. Considering one of the authors, Tony Austin, is in the next room, and here I am hearing about this work from you :)
Kind regards Seref On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 2:16 PM, hepabolu <hepabolu at gmail.com> wrote: > Seref Arikan said the following on 22/7/09 11:39: > > Now about UI - model relationship, my view is the GUI layer is way too > > complex and diverse to include in openEHR specifications, even a subset > > of the UI related stuff would be enough to introduce more problems than > > it solves. > > IF there emerges a cross platform AND cross technology declerative > > markup for GUI and GUI interactions and bindings, and this is a big if, > > then it may be considered, otherwise, my personal opinion is to simply > > Hi, I must confess I've only half followed this discussion due to time > constraints, but this remark comes very close to my findings in a paper > I've written on this topic, which is now available as epub: > > Generic screen representations for future-proof systems, is it possible? > There is more to a GUI than meets the eye. > van der Linden H, Austin T, Talmon J. > Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2009 Sep;95(3):213-26. Epub 2009 Apr 15. > http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19368989 > > Re Orbeon: I think that's a nice start. Should dive into it more in the > near future. > > With regards, > > Helma van der Linden > > _______________________________________________ > openEHR-technical mailing list > openEHR-technical at openehr.org > http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20090722/116aeeb6/attachment.html>
