Hi Tim, Two questions regarding your comments: >I want to speak on (what **I** think) is this underlying REAL problem.
I could not understand what the real problem you describe is. Could you please define it once more? >But the reality is that we have been battling this for more than 45 >years while the rest of the world has moved on....... (see the video on >Youtube about IBM at Johns Hopkins in 1963) Would you mind explaining to where the world has moved on? I'd like to think that I have a decent view of the major work around the issues we have been discussing. So if someone has made significant progress about the things we've been discussing I'd really like to know. Best Regards Seref ps: sending this again due to a dns problem On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 8:48 PM, Tim Cook <timothywayne.cook at gmail.com>wrote: > On Wed, 2009-07-29 at 17:28 +0100, Thomas Beale wrote: > > > > > > But one could build a UI that is not so mundane. We have many more > > > properties in the model behind our forms than is currently included > > > in the templates to achieve that and soon we will have a web client > > > to complement our fat client using the same underlying data model > > I want to speak on (what **I** think) is this underlying REAL problem. > > This is NOT a DATA MODEL issue. (damn I wish educators would quit > teaching this). It is NOT a Java problem it is not a SQL problem.....it > is an INFORMATION problem. > > YOUR (or my) data model don't mean crap. It's about representing the > information in a semantically meaningful way. > > ...... > > Yep...this was an abrasive, affrontive attack on the status que....... > most especially in academia and monpolistic business. > > > Since I am an independent consultant/researcher I guess I have the > liberty to say so. > > We can delve into technical issues if you wish and I'll be happy to > debate them with you. > > > But the reality is that we have been battling this for more than 45 > years while the rest of the world has moved on....... (see the video on > Youtube about IBM at Johns Hopkins in 1963) > > > Think about it. > > ?We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when > we created them.? > --Albert Einstein > > Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting > different results. > --Albert Einstein > > > Yeah; I like to quote him. He was a man of great intellect and > foresight. > > You *****MUST***** think beyond today or you are just padding your > pocket instead of caring about the tomorrow. > > --Tim Cook (2009) > > > -- > Timothy Cook, MSc > Health Informatics Research & Development Services > LinkedIn Profile:http://www.linkedin.com/in/timothywaynecook > Skype ID == timothy.cook > *************************************************************** > *You may get my Public GPG key from popular keyservers or * > *from this link http://timothywayne.cook.googlepages.com/home * > *************************************************************** > > _______________________________________________ > openEHR-technical mailing list > openEHR-technical at openehr.org > http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20090729/9eb5ffd6/attachment.html>
