Rong Chen wrote: > I would say our use case for the link is also between compositions. > For the reasons you mentioned, it would be nice to just use the > archetypeId in the constraint for the value (URI) of the link. Then it > starts to look like a mini query. >
It starts looking like a kind of slot too, but whereas a slot has aggregation semantics (i.e. the data in the slot is "owned" by the containing archetype), a link is just an association. So maybe links could use the same regular expression patterns that slots use. - Peter
