In a message dated 13-11-2009 12:22:04 W. Europe Standard Time,
damoca at gmail.com writes:
>
> There are two possible solutions. Or the RM is changed to represent
> correctly the DV_DATE value as a "xs:date" type with the appropriate ISO8601
> facet or the archetypes should take the form
> value matches {"yyyy-??-XX"}
> to be parsed as a String according to the RM definition.
shouldn't this be yyyymmdd format
and why not the harmonized datatypes for electronic health records /
exchange according to ISO 21090? That is in particular developed for semantic
interoperability of data type formats and based on OpenEHR, CEN and HL7
examples.
It seems a bit silly to use another older standard for this.
Met vriendelijke groet,
Results 4 Care b.v.
dr. William TF Goossen
directeur
De Stinse 15
3823 VM Amersfoort
email: Results4Care at cs.com
email: williamtfgoossen at cs.com
telefoon +31 (0)654614458
fax +31 (0)33 2570169
Kamer van Koophandel nummer: 32133713
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20091113/7552b9d6/attachment.html>
