On Thu, 2009-11-26 at 12:56 +0900, KOBAYASHI, Shinji wrote: > Hi Tim, > > Attached file is the document that I submitted. > Because the scientific demo page is limited in one page, the scenario > was shortned. > This manuscript has not been changed since I sent you before submission.
In that case, that sentence following my first request would have been sufficient. But thank you for sending the document anyway. But you still didn't send the final submission for the workshop following your emails titled "Urgent! about developers' workshop in medinfo2010" dated 14 Oct 2009. That was sent roughly 24 hours before the deadline and contained the text: ===================================================================== "Dear colleagues, I had a great mistaken. I found that 'three page submission' is needed in the instruction for authours of medinfo2010. I thought the page restriction is one page as scientific demo. I added two pages with the web contents. I am very sorry to bothor you, but would you please check the manuscript and add a few words to this." ==================================================================== I didn't have time to review before the deadline and in fact I suggested that you drop the workshop proposal due to the short time frame and lack of preparation of the paper. I don't know if there were any other reviews/changes before you submitted it; therefore I do not know what the final looks like. I would simply like to have a copy of the documents that you submitted; as they were submitted with me as co-author. I do not believe that this is an unreasonable request. Thank You, Tim -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: <http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20091126/aef67e71/attachment.asc>
