I have created a 'Terminology' space on the wiki. Initially I would like to get material from the recent IHTSDO meeting up there. The idea is to create very clear guidelines for archetype design, and to ensure the semantic congruence of archetypes and other aspects of openEHR with terminology. Remembering of course that openEHR is designed to work with any terminology, we will nevertheless be able to use a lot of the thinking coming from IHTSDO and SNOMED-CT.
See http://www.openehr.org/wiki/display/term/Terminology+and+openEHR If anyone wants to add a 'key issue' I suggest you do it by modifying or commenting on the top-level page. Hopefully people from the terminology community, ontology community and also people from user organisations will help us collectively put some shape into this part of the wiki. [note that for pure terminology-related discussions, of course the resources of IHTSDO and other organisations are of course more appropriate than here]. - thomas beale
